- Oswald Chambers, My Utmost For His Highest
I was perusing Amazon, looking up some information on Adam Clarke's Bible commentary, when I read this customer review:
Clarke is an Arminian, that is he denies the doctrines of protestant reformed theology as taught by Luther, Calvin and all the great names of the protestant reformation. As such, I can't recommend this biased work to the church.
Am I then to assume that the guy who wrote the review isn't biased?
Anyway, while this guy didn't go so far as to call Arminians (or, Armenians, as some folks out there like to refer to them) heretics, it's obvious that he thinks they're at least heterodox.
Then you've got the other side of the coin, the Arminians who think Calvinism (along with eternal security, etc.) is damnable heresy.
Puh-lease.
Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/4120.
Maybe we should ignore them? :-)
But then who would defend the Armenians?

I guess I should have known better than to expect serious commentary on this post . . . :)
Incidentally, blest, how do you know when you're baroque?
. . . When you're out of Monet.
In that case, Scott, I'd suggest you go into Haydn.
Hey, at least there's no nudity. . . .
On another note, do you know the definition of a major second?
. . . Two oboes playing in unison.
(As a double-reed player myself, I'm allowed to say that.)
And they said nothing good could come out of the Calvinist/Arminian debates....
Well, as unfriendly as that debate can get, bringing good humor to it is surely the Liszt we can do . . .
Definitely
This discussion tends to bring out people's bassist emotions.
You'd best be careful, Alan--a line like that could get you thrown in the punitentiary.
That would probably depend on the tenor of your defense.
Alan, if that's the best you can do, the Spector of punishment becomes very real . . .

Yeah, there's weirdos out there. On both sides and in countless sides between.
Maybe we should ignore them? :-)