"It may be useful to remember that Christian faith is ultimately dependent upon what actually happened rather than upon the views of historians."

- I. Howard Marshall
ApocaLost Now

No liveblog tonight (because, are you kidding me? It's TWO HOURS. My fingers would fall off). Plus we have friends from the College and Young Singles over to watch, and I wouldn't be much fun hunched over a laptop the whole time.

But feel free to leave your thoughts, theories, and impressions in the comments.

LOST IS BACK!!!

***** Expect Major Spoilers in the Comments Thread *****

Trackbacks:

Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/5802.

Comments on "ApocaLost Now":
1. Bill - 02/02/2010 8:09 pm CST

8:05pm . . . ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?!?!

OK, confused, but that opening was AWESOME!

2. Bill - 02/02/2010 8:21 pm CST

Two Jacks. Twice the fun . . .

Gr-e-e-a-a-a-t.

3. Bill - 02/02/2010 8:23 pm CST

We've got two alternate realities going on here. The one in the plane isn't the same reality as before, because Des is on it, and Hurley is "the luckiest man in the world" - Plus, in the plane reality, the island is submerged.

Man, I hope Juliet is alive.

Maybe Jacob will heal Sayid.

Commercial's over . . . Back to the show.

4. Bill - 02/02/2010 8:24 pm CST

And Locke can walk . . .

OK, everything's different.

5. Bill - 02/02/2010 8:29 pm CST

In this series we've done flash backs. Then we did flash forward.

Now we're doing flash sidewayses.

6. Bill - 02/02/2010 8:50 pm CST

Lots of commercials . . .

Juliet Lives!

And Locke is Smokey, just like I said last year.

7. Bill - 02/02/2010 9:00 pm CST

OK, Locke can't walk. Liar . . .

Where's Shannon?

8. Bill - 02/02/2010 9:01 pm CST

Oh, and I take back what I said about Juliet. :-(

At least Sawyer and Jack now have something worthwhile to fight about.

9. Bill - 02/02/2010 9:28 pm CST

It worked, eh?

Yes, because Sawyer2 got to go to LAX.

This pyramid scene reminds me of Apocalypse Now.

Confused?

10. Bill - 02/02/2010 9:35 pm CST

Everybody was kung fu fighting.

A little Christian Imagery going on here?

Sayid's dead.

BETTER NOT BE!

11. Bill - 02/02/2010 9:36 pm CST

Can Jack fix this?

Doesn't look like it. CRUD.

12. Jared - 02/02/2010 9:36 pm CST

Jack is working on Sayid. This is why Jack is AWESOME. Dude is a relentless workhorse of desperation.

13. Bill - 02/02/2010 9:37 pm CST

So far this show's been an incredible bummer.

14. Bill - 02/02/2010 9:40 pm CST

Well, I hope Jack has some new trick up his sleeve. Man!

I do like the more humble Jack this season. It's not his fault, but he's taking all the blame.

15. Jared - 02/02/2010 9:44 pm CST

So far this show's been an incredible bummer.

Complete disagreement. It's exciting, intriguing, frustrating, mysterious. I love how they've managed to develop the plot while still deepening the mystery, which LOST writers have always done well.

16. Jared - 02/02/2010 9:52 pm CST

Jack Shephard is the Tom Brady of fictitious island worlds

17. Bill - 02/02/2010 10:00 pm CST

OK, Sayid's alive! That's why Miles was acting funny.

Jared, I'm liking the Jack in this season, FYI. That was cool at the end.

So, everyone. Whadjathink?

18. Roy - 02/02/2010 10:07 pm CST

Reminds me of string theory. Lots of (read infinite number of) plots. No conclusions. No testible predictions.

19. GinH - 02/02/2010 10:14 pm CST

I LOVE THIS SHOW!!!!

20. stroke - 02/02/2010 10:16 pm CST

just throwin it out there:

the "everybody safe in LA" world is how the show will end and they're showing us how it will play out as we see how the island reality leads up to getting them there. that way, we aren't left hanging when we see them land at LAX at series end. we'll have seen "what next" all season.

21. Evan - 02/02/2010 10:20 pm CST

I liked the first hour better than the second, but it's all good.

The Locke=smoke monster stuff confirmed what most people were thinking. But Batmanuel should never have gone down without a fight.

The most interesting thing to me was what Bill calls the flash sidewayses. I wonder if the writers are going to show us two entirely different realities all season, likely showing how characters are redeemed in one reality and damned in another. Or whether at some point the two realities will collide or combine. Either way I think it will be interesting.

22. GinH - 02/02/2010 10:35 pm CST

I'm going with the redemption/nonredemption thing. My son said after a while, 'so basically everyone gets back to a crappy life except Jack.' I think the entire show has been leading toward each character's redemption somehow.
I just couldn't love Hurley any more. He's awesome. But I didn't like going back to this dark Sawyer at all. I understand it, but don't like it.
And, is the "real life without the crash" really 100% different? Jack with the cut on his neck, his dad's coffin missing, his seeming recognition of certain things and Desmond's mysterious disappearance could be leading to something more in that reality as well.

23. Andrew - 02/02/2010 10:49 pm CST

Not that it proves anything, or illuminates anything, but my one major Lost call this episode was the fact that when they go through the turbulence, Jack is holding onto his seat. In the original version, he was holding onto Rose's hand when she says, "You can let go now." Alright, I'm out.

24. Bird - 02/02/2010 11:28 pm CST

I remember the term "flash sideways" from that old Chevy Chase movie, Funny Farm.

I really liked the opening episodes. Pretty much what Jared said.

Jacob is awesome (I never thought I'd end up saying that).

Jack is more awesome still.

25. Andrew - 02/02/2010 11:32 pm CST

I don't like Jack, still, but at this point it's more a matter of principle than anything else. I didn't like him from the first episode, and I swore I'd never like him.

I don't like that Ben and Richard are getting messed around by Darth Locke.

26. Cara - 02/03/2010 12:04 am CST

Pure awesomeness. I have nothing more to add.

27. jen - 02/03/2010 5:23 am CST

Good start.

All 2 hours I was wondering where Claire was. And Michael and Walt.

Juliet: I have something to tell you. It's important ...

... I have to die because I'm leaving LOST to go star in V.

28. Bill - 02/03/2010 6:45 am CST

Jen: LOL!

I think one of the most important things said last night: "Nothing's irreversible"

Jeremy, you might be on to something.

Sherri had a good point - Sayid's death, burial and resurrection might mean that he's the new Jacob (Christ-figure).

Which means an all-out, awesome rumble in the jungle between Sayid and Locke at some point!

One thing I'll say: I did not expect last night. It completely took me off guard, which is one thing I love about Lost.

I could have done without Kung Fu Temple, but I'm willing to let that slide for now . . .

29. Bill - 02/03/2010 6:48 am CST

When Darth Locke (hah) told Richard that it was nice to see him out of his chains, was he referring to Richard being (somehow) one of the slaves on the Black Rock?

30. Bill - 02/03/2010 6:50 am CST

Ah - just saw this:

Jared: Complete disagreement. It's exciting, intriguing, frustrating, mysterious. I love how they've managed to develop the plot while still deepening the mystery, which LOST writers have always done well.

Oh, I didn't mean I didn't like it (I loved it!). I just meant that everyone I liked on the show was dying off. Sayid's return made up for most of that.

31. Jared - 02/03/2010 7:11 am CST

Ah, I got ya. Thanks for showing me nothing's irreversible . . . including Andrew's irrational and silly disdain for Jack "The Man" Shephard.

32. Andrew - 02/03/2010 8:23 am CST

Jared,

Irrationality is a condition of human existence. I won't apologize for it.

33. Shrode - 02/03/2010 9:42 am CST

Here's what I think is happening:

We have been shown the "alternate reality". There are some sci-fi theories out there that there are an infinite number of alternate universes. We are being shown two. Or if you go back to Doc Brown's illustration in Back to the Future on the chalkboard, an alternate reality has been created, except in this case the "original" continues...

So, the writers have totally weenied out in my opinion, and here's why:

1- They have now shown the viewers every possible outcome. By the time the show is over, we will have seen what would have happened to our beloved characters if:
a. They got stuck on the island and stayed there.
b. They get rescued and go home.
c. The crash never happened in the first place.

What a cop out. Now everybody can be happy. Or from their perspective, it allows them to pursue all three possiblilites. That just tells me they ran out of ideas. Showing us three different outcomes, just lengthens the show. (Like having three endings at the end of the movie "Clue").

2. Now they can just kill everyone on the island at the end of the series. They will have their cake and eat it too. Because at the end of the series everyone will die on the island, but wait, it's OK. The viewers don't have to be sad, because they are all still alive in alternate "they never crashed in the first place" reality.

Dude, this stuff reminds me of so many Star Trek: TNG time travel episodes it's ridiculous. You know, where time travel causes an alternate reality, but someone is somehow aware that things "aren't quite right". Blah, blah, blah.

I'm still hooked though. I'll be on board til the end.

One thing I liked: Smoke Monster Locke. Nice touch.

My theory: Looks like a centuries long feud between Jacob and Smokey is really the point of the whole show and all events. And every single other character is (including Ben and Widmore and Richard and all the Lostaways) have all just been pawns. It's Jacob vs. Esau. Brother vs. Brother.

34. Bill - 02/03/2010 9:47 am CST

Shrode,

I think it's still too early to know where they are going with this. I'm leaning toward some sort of consolidation of timelines, or to a Stroke-ian "the plane stuff is really the end of the series" thing. But I dunno. All I know is I didn't expect this, so I'm really intrigued.

Yes, Locke-Smokey was cool (and I knew he was smokey last year because every time notLocke showed up, Smokey would soon follow, but never at the same time). And - yes - it's all been about Jacob and Esau.

Now, is Jacob a human (like Richard) who just doesn't age? Or is he something else? He "died" in this episode, and only Hurley can see him because he's dead.

Although, both Jacob and Esau also appear to be able to animate the dead bodies of others (assuming Christian Shephard is Jacob in disguise).

Hmmm...

35. Evan - 02/03/2010 9:48 am CST

((Sayid's death, burial and resurrection might mean that he's the new Jacob (Christ-figure).))

Actually, maybe he is still the old Jacob hiding in dead Sayid's body, just like the man in black is hiding in dead Locke's body.

36. Bird - 02/03/2010 10:12 am CST

When Darth Locke (hah) told Richard that it was nice to see him out of his chains, was he referring to Richard being (somehow) one of the slaves on the Black Rock?

I took that to mean that now that Jacob is dead, Ricardo is no longer immortal and no longer tied (chained) to Jacob.

They have now shown the viewers every possible outcome.

Oh, but the new LAX reality is not really what would have happened, because now Hurley is the lucky guy, Des is on the plane, and no one knows where Walt and Michael are. It's much, much different.

About Locke, sometime here in the next couple of weeks I expect the real Locke to raise from the dead (like Sayid) and for there to be a rumble between fake Lock and real Locke. :-)

37. Jared - 02/03/2010 11:15 am CST

It is quite clear that Jacob is Obi Wan Kenobi.

38. stroke - 02/03/2010 11:18 am CST

I took that to mean that now that Jacob is dead, Ricardo is no longer immortal and no longer tied (chained) to Jacob.

hmmm, not sure about that. the chain reference seemed pretty specific, because richard recognized fauxlocke as esau at that comment.


About Locke, sometime here in the next couple of weeks I expect the real Locke to raise from the dead (like Sayid) and for there to be a rumble between fake Lock and real Locke. :-)

i hope if there is locke-on-locke crime that it looks more realistic than "dharmaville under the sea."

39. GinH - 02/03/2010 11:20 am CST

I'm still not going to automatically assume that Jacob is the good guy here, although it DEFINITELY appears that way. But I just can't help remembering that Ben has always "worked" for Jacob - even tho he killed him, and Jacob let him, but maybe somehow this makes Jacob stronger? - and Ben's always been the bad guy. This show has so many twists and turns that I can NEVER make up my mind about anything!!

40. GinH - 02/03/2010 11:21 am CST

has the other guy actually been called Esau on the show??

41. Michele - 02/03/2010 12:29 pm CST

How inti-climactic was it to have Juliet come alive, say a few words, and die again? They should've just let well enough alone and let Miles say her last words with his "gift" while they buried her. I cried the first time she said goodbye, the second time just drug it out. Because of this, Sayid's "death" barely stirred me, because I had a feeling he'd live again. The writers are really de-sensitizing me to killing off characters, so many come back. For example, don't we all expect the real Locke to resurrect at some point? It's no fun if death isn't taken seriously. I feel like a kid again, when playing Cowboys and Indians, and a kid would not stay dead. It ruins the seriousness of it.
Another downer: The Temple is stupid! It feels like a Disneyland ride, and the characters are dressed up to buckle your seat belt. Also, the side-kick with the granny glasses is a terrible actor. The talent of the LOST cast is sterling, and when a weenie slips in, it's glaring. He's bad, the head Asian is bad, and Alayna's gorilla that was just killed really stunk. Good riddance, said I. These sub-par people seem to demean our friend's as well. They're bad for morale. And the scene where they all stalked around "fortifying" the temple on learning of Jacob's death seemed strange; They were putting up boards to hold the walls up, acting all busy, picking fake flowers. This and the work at the bomb site moving boards around all seemed like a lot of filler.
OK, enough negativity: I loved the plane scenes, and getting to see Charlie and Boone again, even though the former was pretty screwed up. Jack seemed especially cheerful, too, didn't he?
And how funny was it when Jin hopped out of the van saying he'd found a flash-light? I love the conversations between those guys, Hurley, Jin, Charlie, Sawyer, Miles--they strike me as real.
No matter what, I'm in. I agree that the first half was the best. They brought up a bunch more questions, and even brought in more characters. Seems risky, when there's still so many unanswered...but what fun!

42. jen - 02/03/2010 1:27 pm CST

Actually, maybe he is still the old Jacob hiding in dead Sayid's body, just like the man in black is hiding in dead Locke's body.

I might agree with this except that Locke-Smokey-Esau walked right past dead-Locke on the beach.

43. Evan - 02/03/2010 2:10 pm CST

I might agree with this except that Locke-Smokey-Esau walked right past dead-Locke on the beach.

OK, OK - I meant clones of truly dead Locke and presumed dead Sayid. ;)

I like how when I watch this show I take it so seriously, but when talking about it, it sounds so preposterous.

44. Happy - 02/03/2010 3:06 pm CST

I think one of the keys to what they're doing this season actually can be found in Ben's narration of the story up to this point. At the very end of the recap just before the new season started, Ben said something about fate, and brought up the question of destiny versus the power of the human spirit. Can our free will actually change destiny? Or are there some things that will happen, no matter what we do?

I find it interesting that even in the LAX reality, it seems that John Locke may end up walking - if Jack has anything to say about it. Charlie says he was supposed to die. Kate and Claire end up in each others lives. Etc.

And I would just like to state for the record that if Juliet is right, and "it worked" - then she isn't dead. I'm pulling for reality convergence. :)

45. Brian - 02/03/2010 3:38 pm CST

A few thoughts/questions :

- The episode title was "LA X" - not "LAX". Notice the space? Its supposed to have some significance but not sure what it might be.

- Did Sayid really die? As someone said, Miles was acting funny when Sayid was supposed to be dead but that could just be misdirection.

- Is it possible the "under the sea" footage was not from 2004? Again, purposely misleading?

- I don't know how it might work, but I think there might be only one timeline/reality/etc. "Whatever happened, happened"

46. Bill - 02/03/2010 7:30 pm CST

Evan: Actually, maybe he is still the old Jacob hiding in dead Sayid's body, just like the man in black is hiding in dead Locke's body.

Yeah, that's what I meant.

Although, isn't Sayid wearing black? Maybe he's really dead, and just re-animated by the Smoke monster?

Also, you wrote: I like how when I watch this show I take it so seriously, but when talking about it, it sounds so preposterous.

LOL!

47. GinH - 02/03/2010 8:17 pm CST

I like how when I watch this show I take it so seriously, but when talking about it, it sounds so preposterous.

Can't be preposterous. It's all possible. Don't you remember at the beginning the writers said it could all be explained with science. So that means it could happen, right? Right.

48. Quaid - 02/03/2010 9:06 pm CST

Maybe he's really dead, and just re-animated by the Smoke monster?

I don't think this is the case because I don't think the smoke monster re-animates dead things as much as he takes on the appearance of anything he wants (black horse, Waaaaaaalllllllt, Christian, etc.) Also, he resurrected after the defenses had been put up.

Question:
Can the smoke monster/Darth Locke be in more than one place at a time? What about Jacob when he was alive?

Another Question:
Do you think we will see a resurrected Jacob by the end of the series?

Lastly: I am more prone to agree with Stroke that we're seeing how things are going to end up simultaneously with how we get to the "end" than I am to believe that we're seeing a flux capacitor situation of dueling realities. Besides, I don't think the island can accelerate to 88 mph. (And how would we get it hooked to the clock tower?)

I'm going to go listen to Earth Angel.

49. Bill - 02/03/2010 10:47 pm CST

Quaid - lol!

OK, who besides me thinks that Plane Sawyer is TOTALLY going to con "Luckiest man alive" Hurley?

50. Shauna - 02/04/2010 10:05 am CST

I'm wondering what if any significance that Desmond's appearance and sudden disappearance on the plane has, since he's "special," the constant, etc. Is he on another flash trip?

51. Quaid - 02/04/2010 11:37 am CST

"I'm wondering what if any significance that Desmond's appearance and sudden disappearance on the plane has, since he's "special," the constant, etc. Is he on another flash trip?"

Shauna - this is the main reason that I think what we're seeing has to do more with the end of the series than an alternate reality. Desmond wasn't on the original 815.


BUT-
Help me remember. According to Faraday, what was the bomb supposed to accomplish, exactly? Was the goal just to prevent the one eletromagnetic event that brought 815 down or was it to blow up the island entirely?

If the island is at the bottom of the ocean, then that means Desmond isn't in the Hatch and he's free to move about the country. That would also mean that the continuation of what we're seeing on the island is a false reality.

When Juliet said (via Miles), "It worked," I think she was right.


As far as con Sawyer goes, are we sure he's a conman? If he is, I think he might try to con Hurley, but something won't work right.

52. Bill - 02/04/2010 12:14 pm CST

He seems to be a conman, because of the street-smarts he's already displayed and the fact that he told Hurley people would take advantage of him.

I think the people on the Plane have the same vocations. Jack's a spinal surgeon, Kate's a convict, Hurley's a lottery winner, Charlie's the drugged up former bass player for Drive Shaft, and Sawyer's a conman.

OK, big question: when DarthLocke said he just wants to go home, what home was he referring to?

Is there any chance that DarthLocke is the good guy, and Jacob is the bad guy? You heard it here first - that's the way I'm leaning. The only reason we think Jacob's good is because he's healed some people and because he wears white. DarthLocke/Esau wears black, so he must be bad. Smokey is violent, but is referred to as a "security system".

Smokey/Locke is good!

The DarthLocke/Jacob thing reminds me of Locke's backgammon game in the first season, and reminds me of the genius of this show.

53. Bill - 02/04/2010 12:56 pm CST

I'm not big into major theorizing about Lost, but I heard a very compelling theory.

Maybe the time loop thing goes on always. So the Losties are living various permutations of their lives related to the island, over and over and over. The Plane and the Island are just two.

What's got me interested in this? The premier was on Groundhog Day. (I didn't snap to that until someone mentioned it).

54. Mara - 02/04/2010 1:04 pm CST

I think Desmond's disappearance on the flight has to do with Charlie being saved. Didn't Charlie die in order to save Desmond? It's been a while since I saw that episode. But if Charlie died so that Desmond didn't, then when Jack saved Charlie it undid Desmond's saving in the alternate reality.

Does that make sense?

55. jen - 02/04/2010 2:26 pm CST

My head hurts.

According to Faraday, what was the bomb supposed to accomplish, exactly? Was the goal just to prevent the one eletromagnetic event that brought 815 down or was it to blow up the island entirely?

I remember it as being to prevent the one electromagnetic event that brought 815 down.

56. Shauna - 02/04/2010 2:35 pm CST

FWIW, the first time I watched the finale of season 5, I was convinced Jacob was the bad one. I changed my mind when I watched it again, but I'm not convinced about ANYONE when it comes to who's good and who's bad.

57. Debbie - 02/04/2010 3:58 pm CST

Bill, RE the Groundhog Day airing, Jimmy Kimmel had the writers on his show and flat out asked him if certain things were planned or a coincidence. They joked that the Feb 2 airdate was "absolutely planned," but then laughed and said it was a coincidence. There's a partial transcript of their convo here, on the Jimmy Kimmel site on ABC.com.

They also said Desmond disappearing when Charlie appeared was a coincidence.

RE Smokey, does anyone else remember when Locke (the real Locke) stood his ground against the smoke monster in a previous season and the smoke was WHITE. Smokey backed off instead of attacking. Is it possible both Jacob and "Esau" turn into smoke monsters to protect the island? And maybe Esau goes a step further by transforming into other things and/or ppl who have died (like Locke, Christian, Alex)?

58. Michele - 02/04/2010 4:17 pm CST

This may seem surface, but has anyone else noticed how different everyone's hair is on the plane than from the Pilot? It seems sort of a big detail for costume to overlook.
Also, Sawyer may not be a con-man anymore in the alternate. He walks in happy and cheerful, not sullen and haunted. I don't think he just shot an innocent man.

59. brandontmilan - 02/04/2010 4:36 pm CST

I'm pretty sure that LA X is a reference to the Earth X series of Marvel comics that is about an alternate universe, with alternate back stories of all of their superheroes and what not.

In other words, I think the implication is that this IS in fact an alternate timeline and not the actual end to the real timeline.

If you think about it, its possible that a nuclear weapon intensified by an extreme magnetic source would cause the island to pretty much collapse... hence, the island is at the bottom of the sea...

Yet, perhaps the magic/science/specialness of the island still exists... hence, Desmond.

Desmond would have been around the island when he got lost at sea during his trip around the world... maybe he is somehow in the possession of the island as it is underwater... which is why he showed up while they were passing over the island and then disappeared...

60. Michele - 02/04/2010 8:36 pm CST

Well, THAT didn't answer my hair query, Brandontmilan.

61. Quaid - 02/05/2010 4:38 pm CST

I noticed the hair thing, too, but I chalked it up to everyone being six years older.

As far as Smokey staring down Locke, my theory would be that when "Esau" looked into Locke, he didn't destroy him because he knew that he could be used to facilitate his strategy in arriving at his loophole. Just a thought . . .

I don't remember the thing turning White. What Season was that?

62. Quaid - 02/06/2010 9:41 am CST

I was talking with some friends last night and they gave a big thumbs down to the ep - they thought it was less than quality.

I didn't walk away feeling the same. Did anyone else feel that the episode was a letdown?

63. Bill - 02/06/2010 10:31 am CST

I'm sure Lost could really go off the rails, but it didn't in the opening ep.

After five season, I'm so invested in the series I don't think I have the capacity for a lot of disappointment. The premiere caught me totally off guard, which is what I expect from Lost, so I'm good.

I've long since left the ranks of the "More questions! No answers!" Lost critics. I'm enjoying the ride! When all the questions are finally answered, that will be nice, but also a bit of a let down. Because I like wondering and thinking about it.

On the other hand - yes, it was a depressing episode. Juliet dies. Sayid (we thought/still not sure because he might really be Jacob) dies. Half the show shows the cast as if the last five seasons didn't happen . . . it's unsettling.

64. Michele - 02/06/2010 11:40 am CST

Quaid, I've been rewatching old seasons in anticipation of the finale; I did think second half wasn't stellar, especially comparing it to Season 5. Almost every minute of every ep. was perfect. It just doesn't seem the timing, the lines, even the lighting was as quality as "Previously, on LOST". But, like Bill, I'm so invested, I care so much about these guys and this story, I'm addicted. Not a total thumbs-down, but definitely a little tilt.

Leave a Comment:
Name:
URL: (optional)
Email: (optional - will not be published)
Comment:

Please enter the characters you see in the above CAPTCHA image:


Notify me via email if any followup comments are added to this post (show help)