"The word 'no' is the way you keep your commitment to the people you have already said 'yes' to."

- Phil Schroeder
Derek Webb On The Prayer Of Jabez

I found this posted on Daily Random [via Blogs4God] - it's a snippet of a take from Derek Webb of Caedmon's Call fame, regarding the prayer of Jabez. Here's his view:

"i want to be clear about my concern in all this and why i'm so opposed to this teaching. it's not necessarily because of the horrendous exegetical work. it's not necessarily because 98% of bruce's teaching is unwarranted in scripture. it is for only one reason: because it simply undermines the Gospel. this is the only reason that i could justifiably have. please don't misunderstand me; i do not mean to tear down bruce wilkinson or any other aspects of his ministry (i consider his work with 'walk through the bible' good teaching), i only desire to exalt the Gospel. what is the difference in what bruce says and what the Gospel says? bruce says that even if you're a Christian that God has withheld His blessings from you (the 'flood-waters of blessing' as he says) and that He'll give them to you if you systematically pray this rather obscure old testament prayer. i would challenge that idea and say that if you believe upon Christ for your salvation today, God has withheld nothing from you. in fact, he has already flooded all of the blessing you could ever imagine into your life, and that IS Jesus. He is ALL of the blessing. He is ALL our reward. He is sufficient for all of our needs and we should in Him be satisfied. what more could anyone possibly offer you? if you possess the very righteousness of Christ, which earns for you a share in the inheritance of the kingdom of God as though you were His very son or daughter, what more could there possibly be? what more blessing than His body and blood? what could anyone possibly offer more that Christ has already provided? this prayer does not, and cannot bring us "extra-ordinary favor with God," only Christ can. if we truly understood and believed the Gospel, we wouldn't look twice at a teaching like 'the prayer of jabez,' because it would have no power and nothing to offer."
I've not read TPOJ - for those of you who have read it, does what Derek says resonate?

Trackbacks:

Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/398.

Comments on "Derek Webb On The Prayer Of Jabez":
1. Jared - 07/23/2003 8:39 am CDT

Abso-freakin'-lutely.
Webb is a hoss. This is just more reason for my love of Caedmon's Call (even though he's not in the band anymore -- sniff). CC, and Webb on his phenomenal solo album, are all about the glory of God -- God's grace, God's mercy, God's power, God's sovereignty, etc. They/he just blow(s) me away.

Great take on the Jabez phenomenon. I have long hated it.

2. Ian - 07/23/2003 10:13 am CDT

Thanks for the link :)

If anyone's interested in reading the whole thing it's available at http://www.derekwebb.com/journal_content.php?jid=2. It goes into a lot more detail about he specific reasons why the Prayer of Jabez gimmik is wrong.

(By the way... what's a "hoss"? ;))

3. Bill - 07/23/2003 10:32 am CDT

Thanks Ian

Wow - I read some of that, including this snippet:

Derek Webb writes: furthermore, i have personally heard bruce [wilkinson] use phrases like, "if you pray the prayer everyday for 30 days, God must bless you," and, "if you don't pray the prayer you're tying God's hands from being able to bless you as fully as He would like."

yikes

4. jen - 07/23/2003 1:06 pm CDT

I've read it and those thoughts never once crossed my mind. But reading them now and the additional comment above, it certainly does resonate. Thanks for posting that.

5. Tony Rosen - 07/23/2003 4:45 pm CDT

--------- bruce says that even if you're a Christian that God has withheld His blessings from you (the 'flood-waters of blessing' as he says) and that He'll give them to you if you systematically pray this rather obscure old testament prayer -------

What aggrevates me about philosophies such as this is the "What God does for me" angle ... Christianity isn't necessarily, nor wholly, ABOUT US. Everything is to bring Glory to God.

Honestly, if you have accepted Christ, and come into a "saving relationship", what else does God OWE you? Not a single, solitary thing. He's already done and gave it all. And, to top it off, we didn't have to "DO" a thing except believe.

"If I do this, God will bless me." .... Guess what --- even if you don't do "this", God will still bless ... because, that's just "who He is".

6. Jared - 07/24/2003 5:47 am CDT

Tony, Amen.
This is one my beefs with modern Christianity, too.

Somewhat related is how discipelship somehow became a self-centered endeavor. People read the Bible and ask, "What does this mean FOR ME?" instead of first asking, "What does this mean?".

7. Jonathan - 07/24/2003 7:01 am CDT

What do you mean, Jared, and what's in it for me?

8. Bill - 07/24/2003 5:19 pm CDT

Tony - 1,000 amens!

Jared - reach over and slap Jonathan, will ya?

9. Tony Rosen - 07/24/2003 7:56 pm CDT

Just something I figured out fairly recently. I fell "victim" to the "you do this, God does this" crowd. Once I realized that God WANTS to and DOES bless me no matter what, I felt a HUGE burden lifted off of me.

God blessing me isn't reliant on anything I do. There is nothing I can do to make anything happen ("Not by works lest any man should boast"). It's because of God's Grace and Mercy that I am capable of even DOING anything. If that's the case, what can I POSSIBLY do to impress Him? Obviously, since I can do nothing without Him, there's nothing I can do to impress Him.

Me: "Hey, God, look what I did!!"
God: "Great, Tony, look up at night and see what I did."
Me: "Oh, nevermind."

LOL!!!

10. Jared - 07/25/2003 5:55 am CDT

Tony, careful. You're sounding like a -- gasp! -- Calvinist.

Bill, my arm doesn't reach across the Atlantic.

11. Tony Rosen - 07/25/2003 7:47 am CDT

But, *GASP*, we've already determined that ... to some extent ... LOL

12. Jared - 07/25/2003 10:43 am CDT

You mean you are a -- gasp! -- Calvinist? My, that is -- gasp! -- interesting. I don't know why I would think it so -- gasp! -- strange. But it's good to -- gasp! -- have a "brother" around. Um, gasp.

13. Tony Rosen - 07/25/2003 3:32 pm CDT

Breathe, Brother, breathe! ... hyperventaltion will give you the hiccups.

14. Jared - 07/25/2003 3:54 pm CDT

Interesting Calvinist-related tidbit from my last small group meeting:

We had gotten off on some tangent about not judging other people's salvation (which I totally agree with). But anyhoo, one of our leaders said something about this guy named Charles Templeton. Apparently, Lee Strobel interviews Templeton in his book "The Case for Faith." Templeton was going to be "the next Billy Graham" before Billy Graham was ever Billy Graham, apparently. (This was all news to me, so I may have the details wrong. I got all this from my leader dude.) Templeton was an on-fire Christian, dedicated to the Gospel, etc. Then one day he saw a picture of a dying African child on the cover of a news magazine and had a change of heart. He decided that no god would be that evil to let that happen.
Now Templeton is a confirmed atheist who devotes his life to discreding the historical and truth claims of the Christian faith.

My leader dude's point was that he thinks Templeton is saved and he will see him in heaven one day.

I respectfully pointed out that, although I would never say for sure someone was not saved -- in my view, one's salvation is God's business and their own -- I thought believing a confirmed atheist would get into heaven based on some long ago confession was what Dietrich Bonhoeffer would call "cheap grace."
Now, I wouldn't rule out Templeton eventually coming around and changing his mind. Perhaps this is all a (very) long "wilderness period," or an extended backslide.
But what if he goes the rest of his life doggedly insisting there is no God and that Jesus was just a man and did not rise from the dead and that there is no heaven or hell, and he dies still believing all of this? Again, his salvation is known only to he and God, but may I offer a guess? I think the Bible says a lot about perseverance and bearing fruit and how works are the evidence of our saving faith. If this guy goes his whole life without any of these, can he still be saved?

Short answer: I don't know. I wouldn't rule out the validity of any specific person's deathbed conversion, on one hand. But on deathbed conversions generally, I am dubious.

This is all just leading up to my Calvinist-related point, by the way.
So I mentioned my concerns with this "cheap grace" scenario. This other dude piped up in agreement. He is a middle-aged dude (probably late 40s), a very intelligent lawyer, a big time history buff (both world and Christian), and an avid reader of religious and theological texts. Obviously, we get along quite swimmingly. He's been teasing me about me "making" him read Calvin's Institutes. This despite the fact I've never brought them up and have never read them cover to cover myself.

Anyway, this dude said, "I tend to agree with Jared." He went on to talk about fruit and perserverance and how salvation is more than mental assent. While he had me going, he then stopped me in my tracks. He said: "You know the Bible talks about nothing can snatch us from the hand of God. But I wonder sometimes if we can't snatch ourselves out."
I politely interrupted. "Well, I don't necessarily agree with that," I said.
He laughed, "Well, of course not, you're a Calvinist."
Everybody laughed (goodnaturedly, of course -- I didn't feel made fun of or anything).
Then the leader who started the thread echoed a "Seinfeld" line: "Not that there's anything wrong with that."
I joked, "Well, just brand me then."
The other leader, my "new friend," the worship leader guy who wants me eventually help him write his script thing, cut in: "I'm a Calvinist too."

It was good to have a "brother" present.

"The grass looked greener
On the other side
So I tried
To snatch myself from Your hand.
Caught a boat to anywhere
But Nineveh
And well you know
I ended up on dry land.
I've done the work of Sisyphus
Trying to get myself over this hill
But the one thing I can't get over now
Is the force of Your will."
-- Caedmon's Call, 'There You Go'

15. Bill - 07/25/2003 4:21 pm CDT

Man, I feel bad because this is the second correction I've had to lay on Jared today

The song is called "Where I Began";"0

16. Jared - 07/25/2003 6:19 pm CDT

Dude, I realized that RIGHT AFTER I logged off last, and I didn't want to log back on just to correct it.
I've said it before -- I'm terrible with song titles. "There You Go" is another good "Calvinist song," though.

17. Tony Rosen - 07/26/2003 5:12 am CDT

Can you "lose your salvation" for blaphemy against the Holy Spirit AFTER you have accepted Christ??? THAT'S the one which has me baffled...

By the way, "Case for Christ" is an awesome book ... if you're the analytical/logical type ... otherwise, it'd be the worst book you've ever read ...

18. Jared - 07/26/2003 5:36 am CDT

I haven't read CforC, but I've long appreciated it since Strobel is an ex-Willow Creeker and one of the chapters in that book is an interview with hoss of all hosses D.A. Carson.

19. Jared - 07/26/2003 5:38 am CDT

I don't think someone who was sincerely blaspheming the Holy Spirit (whatever that reference means -- perhaps "the unforgivable sin" is good subject for a future post) would be a Christian in the first place.
Just my take. I've never really studied the unpardonable sin/blaspheming the Holy Spirit, so I don't have a good take on what they entail. Anyone?

Comments are closed