"The first and most important thing to say about John Dominic Crossan's work is that it is bad history."

- D.A. Carson
Review: Les Miserables

Yesterday my family saw the film Les Miserables, directed by Tom Hooper, based on the music and lyrics from the incredibly successful musical, based on the beloved novel of the same name by Victor Hugo. One might think it would be hard not to make a successful film with such material, while on the other hand, when producing a film interpretation of a work adored by millions, how easy it might be to disappoint.

Well, it does not disappoint. This film is a towering achievement. We sat enthralled for the entire 157 minutes of it.

When transitioning a story from the stage to film, some changes, of course, need to be introduced. I've become very familiar with the stage rendition, having seen it twice (once in London and once in Texas) and our kids have listened to the original 1987 Broadway soundtrack seemingly non-stop for the past few weeks. The film takes liberties, shortening some of the songs, adding at least one new song, changing a lyric here and there, and lengthening some songs with a bit more sung dialog. In a stage play, due to the distance of the majority of the crowd from the actors, so much of the plot and emotional development is conveyed through the voices and the set. In a film, closeups of the action and the actors are possible, and there is more information conveyed through the acting than is possible in a stage play. In addition, the visual scope of a film can go far beyond a small stage area and moveable props. As a result, the reliance on voice in this movie is lessened. The singing is still fantastic, but the vocal performances are more variable, more subservient to the action.

The cast of Les Miserables is remarkable. I thought Anne Hathaway put in a very strong performance as Fantine, both in her acting and vocally (Eldest Son wasn't as impressed: he said that while she certainly threw her heart and soul into the part, he could see in her eyes what she was thinking: "Best Supporting Actress. Best Supporting Actress, Best Supporting Actress."). Hugh Jackman is fabulous as Jean Valjean. His is a role with very challenging and wide ranging vocal and emotional requirements and he nails them all. Eddie Redmayne is a very strong Marius, particularly in the last third of the film, and Samantha Barks completely inhabits the role of Eponine, beautifully capturing the sadness, the heroism and self-sacrifice of the character. Other strong performances are turned in by Aaron Tveit as the barricade leader Enjolras - indeed, all the "barricade boys", as my wife calls them, were very good - and young Daniel Huttlestone as the brave street-urchin Gavroche.

Not all the characters are perfectly cast, however. While there is disagreement among my family members, I feel that Russell Crowe is not the best fit for Javert. That role requires a very strong vocal performance and Crowe, while a very fine actor who has, by the way, an amazing voice for speaking-parts, falls a little short as a singer. I also feel that Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen as the Thernardiers miss the mark a bit. They are entertaining, certainly, and I think the fault lies less with them than with the way they were directed. They are (if this is possible for the Thernardiers) too over-the-top for my taste.

There are some nice additions to the film as well, some items brought in from the book, such as Javert's pursuit of Jean Valjean and Cosette and their escape over the wall of a convent following her liberation from the Thernardiers. In addition, as a very nice touch, there is the casting of Colm Wilkinson in the role of the Bishop. Wilkinson was the original Jean Valjean in the stage play.

A friend of mine remarked, after seeing the film, that it was more of a sermon than a movie. And he meant that in a good way, meaning almost the exact opposite of what critics mean when they call a film "preachy". Like a good sermon, my friend continued, this film gives you a lot to think about, to dwell upon. And it does. Les Miserables is a masterful study of grace versus law, sacrifice and selflessness versus greed and power, and ultimately, redemption. As the multitudes sing in the masterful final scene of the film:


do you hear the people sing
Lost in the valley of the night?
It is the music of a people
who are climbing to the light.

For the wretched of the earth
there is a flame that never dies.
Even the darkest night will end
and the sun will rise.

They will live again in freedom
in the garden of the Lord.
They will walk behind the ploughshare;
they will put away the sword.
The chain will be broken
and all men will have their reward.

Will you join in our crusade?
Who will be strong and stand with me?
Somewhere beyond the barricade
is there a world you long to see?
Do you hear the people sing?
Say, do you hear the distant drums?
It is the future that they bring
when tomorrow comes.


I highly recommend Les Miserables. 4 1/2 out of 5 stars.

Trackbacks:

Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/6757.

Comments on "Review: Les Miserables":
1. ZZ - 12/26/2012 12:24 pm CST

The movie might compare well to the MUSICAL, but how does it compare to the BOOK? Because the musical was a vapid ripoff of the book.

2. Bill - 12/26/2012 12:32 pm CST

ZZ,

Well, I'm only about 1/2 way through the book (unabridged) but so far very well.

There's no accounting for taste, but I disagree with your assessment of the musical. Also, how can a musical that is based on a novel be a "ripoff" of it?

If you don't like the musical (which, obviously, you don't) you probably won't like the movie. It's not just based on the musical, it is the musical, with slight tweaks.

3. Bird - 12/26/2012 1:33 pm CST

Reading the unabridged Les Miserables was a life changing event for me. I read it during the darkest days of my life, when it was a challenge to even wake up and face the day. My life was full of uncertainty and Hugo's book (next to the Bible) was like an anchor. Hugo had a gift.

I hope to see this movie this weekend. Lord willing.

4. nhe - 12/26/2012 4:12 pm CST

ZZ, not liking the broadway production of Les Mis, is, to me, like a kid not liking Christmas, but to each his own. Good review Bill - can't wait to see it!

I feel that 157 minutes is too short, but only because I can't get enough of this story.

Maybe they'll make an unabridged movie version some day.


5. Karl - 12/26/2012 5:42 pm CST

I hadn't picked up the novel since college, am now about a quarter through it and enjoying reading it through more mature (hopefully) eyes. I had hoped to make it to the end before seeing the new film but I doubt I'll be able to hold off.

6. Bill - 12/26/2012 5:45 pm CST

nhe, after seeing it I too was surprised that it's only 2 1/2 hours long. It seemed longer while watching it (and I mean that in a good way). I was certain it was 3+ hours until I looked it up.

7. ZZ - 12/26/2012 10:48 pm CST

I guess "ripoff" was a bad choice of word. I meant something like "shallow summary" or "maudlin hackjob"

I can imagine a person converting to Christianity after reading the book, or at least deciding to give it a much closer look. No way with the musical. Looks like I'm skipping this one.

8. Neo - 12/26/2012 11:37 pm CST

Description sounds interesting enough, but to watch it, I have to inquire: any zombies in it...?

9. nhe - 12/27/2012 6:42 am CST

ZZ - I was already converted when I saw the play (3 times) but I definitely became more convinced of my eternal hope each time I saw it. I don't think anyone can ask anymore of an art form that that.

10. Tony - 12/27/2012 9:53 am CST

I guess I didn't read up enough on the new movie as I was surprised that the movie was based on the musical. Or rather, I was surprise 99% of the lines were sung. The movie had a serious setting/tone that demanded spoken dialog in my opinion.

Bill, I agree that the Thernardiers were over the top however they provided some comic relief that the movie needed.

I'm a bit hard on the movie (as a musical) because I never read the book or saw the musical, so I was a bit surprised for example as to why Fantine died. She had the strength to cut up a customer, and then what seemed like that same night, died in a hospital. From what? I missed that line in the song ;)

And then they didn't give enough background on Jean Valjean in this movie. I felt like his past wasn't 'bad enough' to allow for a more dramatic ending. So, he broke parole and this makes him an 'arch-enemy' of Javert? Out of all the cases that someone like Javert could come across in his lifetime, he gets caught-up in someone who broke parole.

So I agree with Nhe, they needed another 15 minutes :)

With that said, Fantine's solo was very moving. You could here a pin drop in the theatre, when she pauses at the end. Btw - can someone in real life sing on key when they are crying or even choked up? Another reason the musical aspect bothers me a bit, but I digress. A great movie though.

11. Bill - 12/27/2012 11:23 am CST

Tony,

Javert was consumed with his hunt for Jean Valjean for multiple reasons. Chief among them that Valjean, after his cleansing, became mayor of the town and Javert worked for him, not realizing that he was a convict who had broken parole. And that JVJ had escaped him (in the book there's a fantastic scene, represented in the movie also, where JVJ and Cosette elude Javert and escape, seemingly in midair, by climbing over the wall of a convent).

The turning point for Javert was the song "Stars", where he swears to never rest until he has hunted down JVJ. That comes after the escape, and with the bitterness of having been duped all that time.

On Fantine, there is time-compression. She was a hooker for awhile and became sick over time.

12. nhe - 12/27/2012 11:47 pm CST

Tony I'd recommend the '97 version with Liam Neeson or even the '78 version w/ Richard Jordan - both of those are available on video and are good "non sung" versions, but they're certainly not definitive.

For example, none of the modern versions (until this new one) even mentions Eponine and as a character, and she's such an essential part of the story - she may be my favorite character.

I think actually that the '78 Richard Jordan version does the best job w/ Val Jean's conversion - I think I'm the only person I know who has actually seen that version. It may have been made for TV, I'm not sure that it was released in theaters.

The '97 Liam Neeson version is well done, I just feel like its very short - not enough of the story is presented.

So, I can't wait. My wife and I are going to go New Years Day, we're pretty psyched - we've been wearing out the CD from the musical for the last few weeks to get ready.

13. Tony - 12/28/2012 8:28 am CST

Nhe,
Oh, so you haven't seen the movie but you already have formed an opinion that it should be longer ;)

Thanks for the recommended movies. I looked them up on Netflix streaming and they are not available. However, there is a 2000 made for TV version with John Malkovich. Is that one any good?

You'll be happy to hear that Eponine is well represented in the new movie. I hope Bill and I didn't spoil too much for you :)

I'm still torn about the musical aspect. On one hand, I was "crying out" speak in certain scenes, but on the other, the more I think about it, it is a work of art. That was the first time the plot of Les Miserables was introduced to me and I understood it, despite it being sung.

Btw - I recommend seeing the new movie at an Alamo Drafthouse if there is one in your area. They do an excellent job with the pre-movie short films. They find a bunch of French Revolution, musical themed, French commercial short clips and play one after another for the Les Miserables movie. ie they showed the clip from Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure with Napoleon and then showed Susan Boyle's audition of I dreamed a dream on Britain's Got Talent as examples.

14. Flyaway - 12/28/2012 5:54 pm CST

Bill--great review. We need people like you to review movies. I love the lines in the final song--"They will live again in freedom
in the garden of the Lord." Plan to see the movie soon.

15. nhe - 12/30/2012 11:06 am CST

Tony yes - I think the definitive Les Mis movie should be 3 hours plus. I think the Malkovich version is a miniseries and longer, which I would like - I haven't seen it.

Yes, I can definitely recommend this movie even though I won't see it till New Years Day. I know all the words!

16. damien - 01/02/2013 8:04 am CST

i was completely unprepared for the impact this movie had on me. i was transfixed and have not stopped weeping. emotions too deep for words were stirred. this is essentially what lewis was describing in surprised by joy...a kind of awakening. but i've never experienced any work of art that so directed me toward god himself.

17. Pet Sitting Arlington Heights - 01/30/2013 1:06 am CST

I'm happy I found this blog, I couldnt discover any info on this subject matter prior to. I also run a site and if you want to ever serious in a little bit of guest writing for me if possible feel free to let me know

Leave a Comment:
Name:
URL: (optional)
Email: (optional - will not be published)
Comment:

Please enter the characters you see in the above CAPTCHA image:


Notify me via email if any followup comments are added to this post (show help)