- Rick Warren
I hate reality TV.
Well, let me moderate that a bit. I really dislike most of it. I hardly ever watch it, but sometimes it's on and sometimes it gets me thinking.
I was musing the other day on the contrast between three of the biggies: Survivor, Biggest Loser, and Extreme Home Makeover.
Survivor is, as far as I know, the most popular of the reality shows and the show that sparked the glut of reality - and wasn't TV supposed to give us an escape from reality? Erk - that we currently have on the airwaves.
I despise that show. And I know I'm in the minority here. Consider what it, generally, takes to win. The show is a great example of natural selection, the survival of the fittest. In general, treachery, double-dealing, conceit, self-seeking, flattery and ruthlessness win the day. I've never understood why a show with so little redeeming value is so popular. But maybe it's because it reflects on the human condition. We recognize very well what we see in Survivor. It's in the deepest heart of each of us.
Biggest Loser is a show that I actually keep up with, intermittently. I admit I kind of like it. And it does have its redemptive qualities; who doesn't love seeing obese and unhealthy people turn their lives around through hard work and perseverance?
But I'm realizing that one of the draws of Biggest Loser for me is Law. Though there is often compassion and tenderness between the competitors, there is no grace regarding the results. The scale doesn't lie. I was talking to a personal trainer the other night and she likes the show as well but is horrified by the way they go about losing weight. Losing weight that fast, with brutal six hour a day workouts, is not safe. But we applaud Biggest Loser, with all its talk of "taking control of your life", "earning it", and "working your [behonkus] off". The Law can be appealing. It speaks to the drive that is in most of us to earn our own way toward our own goals through our own efforts without the help of grace.
Which brings me to Extreme Home Makeover. Oddly enough, I think that Extreme Home Makeover may be the closest picture of the Gospel in reality TV today. Have you noticed that the family being blessed is not even allowed to work on the house? And "makeover" is an understatement, to say the least. Generally, the house is completely gutted and rebuilt from the ground up.
I've thought, at times, that I would be uncomfortable as an Extreme Home Makeover blessee. I think that I would be embarrassed to not have any part in the renovation of a house that I had let, often due to my own hard circumstances, go to rot. I also might be a bit nervous about what I would see when that bus finally moved out of the way, because none of it was my doing or my plan.
My relationship with God is like that, most of the time. I want him to come in and fix my creaking floor, or repaint my bathroom, or install a new garage door opener (all, incidentally, recent needs in my actual house). His plan, and he means to complete it, is to gut the place, design a whole new floorplan, and build something Magnificent, just like He is.
It may make me uncomfortable, but it is Good News. And considering my skills in spiritual home repair, it is Very Good News.
Master Builder, have Your way.
"Imagine yourself as a living house. God comes in to rebuild that house. At first, perhaps, you can understand what He is doing. He is getting the drains right and stopping the leaks in the roof and so on; you knew that those jobs needed doing and so you are not surprised. But presently He starts knocking the house about in a way that hurts abominably and does not seem to make any sense. What on earth is He up to? The explanation is that He is building quite a different house from the one you thought of - throwing out a new wing here, putting on an extra floor there, running up towers, making courtyards. You thought you were being made into a decent little cottage: but He is building a palace. He intends to come and live in it Himself." - C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/6607.
If you get Bravo, I would highly recommend Top Chef. It's often nominated for Best Reality Show Emmy, (and I think is the current winner of the award).
It's easily my favorite reality show and there isn't too much politics and often grace in the judging. The competition is against one's self just as much as it is against others.
As for the shows that you've dissected, I appreciate your analysis. Do you really think that Biggest Loser is as unhealthy as your trainer makes it seem? They have medics there monitoring everything. I feel like they do a good job of protecting the contestants.
Fly - the "Christians" in the last Survivor (Brandon in particular) were among the worst examples of what it means to be a Christ follower ever committed to video - I much prefer Matt from a few seasons back - wonderful Christian guy.
Survivor is AWESOME......but I'm not a fan of either of the other 2 shows - too cheesy.
I know, Bill's shocked I would say that.
When I was in college, my discipleship group played RISK every weekend (we were nerds). If you know RISK you know that (much like Survivor) its a game of alliances. Before each game, we would vote on "can alliances be broken?" - If the the vote was "yes" then people could make an alliance with another player (not to attack each other) and then renig - it was a fun twist.
I've always thought of Survivor as "Risk with broken alliances allowed" - which is why it has been among my favorite shows of all-time.
I also dated a past Survivor winner in college (that's a fun story for another time).
Survivor is AWESOME......but I'm not a fan of either of the other 2 shows - too cheesy.
I know, Bill's shocked I would say that.
Yes, I fell over after reading that, I was so surprised :-)
Here's where Karl chimes in, and also agrees that Survivor is the bomb, while remarking that the word "cheesy" to refer to BL and EHM, while technically true, is a little "harsh".
Then he'll mention that he, too, dated a survivor winner in college.
Regarding EHMO.....I've never thought of it as resembling the gospel, for one reason. Every family that gets the makeover has at least one member who is the 2nd coming of Mother Theresa.....so one-dimensionally wonderful despite being kicked around by life, that they deserve the house - like its the least the show could do.
I think the show would be a closer picture of the gospel if they built the house for a pre-regenerate Ebenezer Scrooge, as he stood there with a 5th of vodka in his hand watching them build......then, on the "where are they now" show a few years later, we find out he's turned the house into an orphanage for "Tiny Tims".
I watched season 2 (I think) of Survivor and really enjoyed it. It was the season that Elizabeth (Filarski) Hasselbeck was on the show. Her nice-ness while still being competitive was such a refreshing difference to the scheming and machinations of many of the other competitors. My wife suspected that I had a crush on her. I've watched parts of a couple of other seasons but none in recent years. Part of my distaste is all the lying, scheming and backstabbing, and a couple of times when I tried to watch after that one season I just couldn't find any competitors who I found appealing to root for.
We watch very little TV. I watch sports a fair amount, but that accounts for probably 80% of the time our TV is on. So I don't usually have a lot to add to discussions about tv shows, reality or otherwise.
I have a good friend who loves The Biggest Loser and says he sees all kinds of redemptive messages in it, as the trainer looks at these people and sees not what they are now but who they were made to be and who they can be. I hadn't thought of the unhealthy/risky aspects of the intense workouts for such heavy people. I'm sure they sign all kinds of waivers. With medics present and the like, I'm sure the contestants themselves are relatively safe. But to the extent it encourages other similarly out of shape people to go out and try to do too much too fast, I can see why it would be a trainer's nightmare.
Part of my distaste is all the lying, scheming and backstabbing, and a couple of times when I tried to watch after that one season I just couldn't find any competitors who I found appealing to root for.
Yes.
I've never thought of it as resembling the gospel, for one reason. Every family that gets the makeover has at least one member who is the 2nd coming of Mother Theresa.....so one-dimensionally wonderful despite being kicked around by life, that they deserve the house - like its the least the show could do.
Good point, nhe, but I didn't say it was a picture of the gospel, I said it was "the closest" picture of the gospel in reality TV, and that for a few specific reasons outlined in the post.
Yeah Karl....you had a crush on a "participant" in season two, but I actually dated the winner.....so there! *Note, I would never actually "marry" someone who would go on a reality show, which is why it didn't work out.
Bill, I like my gospel more "messy" (and full of "lying, scheming and backstabbing" - at least that should be part of the story) - seems more true to life, and more like me. :)
Watched the 1st season of Survivor. Richard Hatch won. Never watched another season.
Beck and girls watch "Biggest Loser." I don't. Not interested.
Beck and I watch "Amazing Race." I like this reality show b/c even though there is some drama and scheming, typically racers are too busy to get too bogged down in it. We get to root for nice people and see all these different parts of the world at the same time. Very cool.
In terms of "reality shows," we also like the A&E/History shows "Pawn Stars," "Storage Wars," and "American Pickers," but those aren't really game show-type reality shows. I like the history, the curiosity, and the eccentricity of those shows.
Oh, I take that back: We did watch the Survivor season that was in Australia where Colby(?) gave away the winning spot to that lady. Pretty nice of him. But we didn't watch any others. Too "gross."
Same with "Big Brother." Watched the very first season; was intrigued by the premise (somewhat "Real World"-like, which was way different in its first 2-3 seasons than it is now), gave it up after that first run.
Same here on Big Brother Jared......that show jumped the shark after the one-legged guy (season 1)
Bill, I like my gospel more "messy" (and full of "lying, scheming and backstabbing" - at least that should be part of the story) - seems more true to life, and more like me. :)
OK. :-)
To prevent another 100 comment post, I'm going to just affirm that you and I love the same gospel (there's only one) and just express our admiration for and appreciation of it in different ways.
My point was only (only, only, only, singularly, and specifically) that the gift that is given in EHMO is not earned. You make a good point that it is somewhat earned (to be fair, I've only watched maybe three episodes of EHMO in my life) - I fully agree with you. It's an imperfect picture.
Bill - I'm not arguing!!! The gospel is a diamond.......there a gazillion places from which truth radiates. Your prism angles are just as valid is mine.
good point Quaid - maybe Happy Days would NOT have jumped the shark if Fonzie had one leg.
nhe you are right about Brandon on Survivor. My husband and I played Risk all the time years ago with another couple. The men were all in to strategy while the women were more spontaneous. Our wins were about equal. It is sort of like life. God blesses us in spite of ourselves!
Survivor is sometimes fun to watch, but ultimately a pretty vacuous endeavor. While it doesn't exactly offend my moral sensibilities, I can only take so much of players using "the Game" as a way to justify being a horrible person.
I've never watched the Biggest Loser, because I suspect I'd feel guilty and lazy the entire time.
Extreme Home Makeover always makes me happy. It's also my fiance's favorite show, so...
Extreme Home Makeover always makes me happy. It's also my fiance's favorite show, so...
Wait...wait....wait....back the truck up....
Did you say, "fiance"?
You're engaged?!?!
Congratulations, man, that's awesome! :-)
(On a side note, that was a little bone for those of you who like reality TV. We just threw a little dose of reality drama in there...not on purpose. Totally spontaneous. Really.)
Seriously, Andrew that's great dude.
The Biggest Loser always breaks my heart because I grow to love the people and know they leave the Ranch slaves to their sin. They all have the same epiphany that goes something like this: "I learned I need to love myself. I've never done anything for myself, it's always been for others. Now it's about me." Etc. blah, blah, blah. They're problem IS them. They love themselves AND their sin more than anything in the universe and until they realize this, they're doomed to be fat in this world and destroyed in the next.
Not one contestant has ever realized they're full of wicked desires that control them and want to kill them. Not one has admitted the real enemy is themselves. It's tragic.
Michelle,
I think that issues like overeating, alcoholism, drug abuse, etc. are often symptoms of serious self-loathing. They don't start out that way, necessarily, but they eventually become that. If you hate yourself, it is likely that you will treat yourself very rotten, even if the immediate result is pleasure. Drug abuse, for instance, is often used as an escape from despair. The idea that people who are pathological over-eaters are so because they just love themselves too much seems to be missing a point about addictive personalities. In many cases, growing to love yourself, or at least to see yourself properly in the light of grace is a huge step towards recovery. That is not to say that the contestants on the show necessarily have any kind of Christian epiphany, but hating oneself is just as much a sin as loving oneself too much. Both conditions, after all, indicate the same sin, which is Pride.
Ephesians tells us, "No man ever hated his own flesh, but feeds and cares for it..." When the Proverbs talk about people addicted to various substances, they attribute it to foolishness and greed, not self-loathing.
Behind every addiction (and every sin, for that matter,) is someone believing the same old lies told to the woman in the Garden.... "Do what you want, you'll be like God, there will be no consequences, God is keeping something good from you..."
I agree with you, that to end the tyranny of addiction, one must see oneself properly. That is the only hope. But, that doesn't begin with loving oneself more. It begins with seeing God properly.
I think that seeing God properly often involves viewing oneself in a healthier light. God loves me, God makes me valuable, therefore I cannot believe the lie that I am worthless and unlovable.
Greed and foolishness certainly play their parts, but it is certainly possible to imagine a person who is greedy, foolish, AND despairing of their own life.
The Ephesians passage is referring to marriage, and not addiction. In truth, I'm not quite sure what Paul means, because there are many examples of people not caring for their flesh (suicide being the most obvious). Going back to the Biggest Loser, I think it's clear that the contestants don't care for their flesh. They indulge it. Perhaps that's caring for it too much, but then what would one say about those with eating disorders, or meth addicts?
You are correct that behind every sin is the same ancient lie, but I think it's simplistic to think that every time a sin is committed, it is a product of pure hedonism, or that we keep doing the same things simply because we desire to feel excellent all the time. I say it is simplistic, because it ignores the despair aspect of sin. The typical pattern of addiction takes one from pleasure-seeking to despair. Nearly every recovering addict will admit that there is a point in which the substance becomes simply a crutch to try to get through their wretched lives. If it was all about pleasure, it seems there would never be any urge to get well.
I'm not arguing that loving oneself too much never comes into play, because it certainly does. And, as I said before, I think that any unhealthy self-image, whether negative or positive, springs out of the same basic sin, which is Pride. Because of that, I think it's entirely possible for the two poles to compete against one another in the same soul, and even, at times, to coexist.
I agree with Andrew. If having a proper perspective on oneself entails seeing oneself the way God sees one, then it seems to me that there are two directions in which one can err.
That is - (1) one can have an inordinate and inappropriate love of self, unchastened by humility or the truth of sin. Or (2) one can inappropriately loathe this person (herself) who was created in the image of God and is loved by God. They are unable to see themselves as having any worth, could never believe they are the lost coin, the lost sheep, the longed-for child that the father is desperately wanting to return home.
Inordinate self-hatred is just as much of a skewed view as inordinate self-love. As Andrew kind of stated above, they are sort of opposite sides of the same prideful coin. In them I define myself by what I think of myself rather than by what God says about me.
Often, life experiences and our own subsequent choices shape which of these two errors we are most prone to fall into. Many people fall into both, at different times or in different spheres of their life.
Andrew-the bottom line of Paul's meaning is Ephesians is that people love their own bodies, and sacrifice for them. Jesus did it with us, (the Church) and a husband should do this for his wife.
So too, even in suicide people worship themselves. It's a very selfish act, usually not related to self-loathing, but a despair that they're suffering and want it to end.
Think about it--if you really loathe someone, hate them, you don't mind if they suffer. (Terrible, but true.) You probably actually like the idea and think they deserve it. So, if someone truly hated themselves, they'd accept suffering, knowing they deserve it. Instead, they say, "I can't suffer this way. I must escape this. I want to feel good, so I will end this suffering. Because I care about myself."
Addictions are a form of self-love--the person just wants to feel good. If they hated themselves, they wouldn't care if they feel good or not. We don't want our enemy to feel good, do we?
So, Karl, I don't think there is such a thing as self-hatred at all. Possibly depression, anger, despair because one doesn't have the body, money, family, life, that one wants, but still, it gets back to a caring for oneself. We think, "Hey! I deserve better!" It always gets back to self-obsession, or at least, a great care for oneself, and what one has, feels, etc.
We're valued and loved only because God values and loves us, not because there is something so cool about us. Consider in Luke, when Jesus describes the three "lost" things--in each story, the searcher is obsessed over something rather menial--a lost sheep, (in comparison to the entire flock left behind), an ungrateful son, and one lousy coin.
We do have an intrinsic value, the image of God, but even that is not from us, if you think about it. And, sadly, Hell will be full of people made in God's image--so He calls the shots as to how far He will value and love us.

Well said. BTW on the last 2 Survivors there have been "Christians" and some praying on it. We always want the "good" people to win and the "bad" people to lose. Some people were so "bad" that the majority of viewers wanted them to lose.