"And do you now begin to see why Christianity has always said that the devil is a fallen angel? That is not a mere story for the children. It is a real recognition of the fact that evil is a parasite, not an original thing. The powers which enable evil to carry on are powers given it by goodness."

- C.S. Lewis
Universalism Takes One Down

TULSA, Okla. - A once prominent leader in the charismatic movement has been forced to shut down his church in the wake of a radical change in his theological beliefs.

Eight years ago, Bishop Carlton Pearson's Higher Dimensions Church had about 6,000 members. He served as a guest host on the Trinity Broadcasting Network, was a member of the Oral Roberts University board of trustees, and was among group of black religious leaders who advised President-elect George W. Bush after the 2000 election.

But Pearson then began preaching that everyone goes to heaven, a theology he calls "the gospel of inclusion." Not long after, evangelical leaders rejected Pearson, the membership in his church fell to a few hundred, and the church's property was lost in foreclosure. Its few remaining members have now been merged into a Unitarian congregation.


Pearson now believes that literally everyone goes to heaven. He believes that the blood of Christ pays for everyone's sins. Everyone's. There is no hell in the afterlife. He believes that hell is the suffering that people experience on earth.

Here he is being profiled on ABC News:


Here's Part 2.

And here's the print version of the same story.

Yes, I noticed Ted Haggard on there, and the irony isn't lost on me. I'm not sure about the timeline, but apparently this video was filmed a few years ago, but the church just officially folded this month.

What's interesting to me is that the media seems to be noticing that doctrine matters to Christians. (Shocking, but true.)

"I couldn't reconcile a God whose mercy endures forever, and this torture chamber that's customized for unbelievers," Pearson said.

And he often agonized over the fate of his non-Christian family members. According to his faith, they were doomed to hell.

"How can you really love a god who's torturing your grandmother? And that's what I went through for years."

The more he studied, the more Pearson saw the Bible not as the literal word of God but a book by men about God -- primitive men prone to mistranslations, political agendas and human emotions. And one night, as he watched Peter Jennings' report on the parade of suffering in Rwanda, he had a revelation.

"I remember thinking that these were probably Muslims because God wouldn't let that happen to Christians," he said. "Unbelieving Muslims, little starving babies and that they were going to die and go to hell."

"And that's when I said, 'God, how could you, how could you call yourself a loving God and a living God, and just let them suffer like that, then to suck them into hell?'" he continued. "And that's when I thought I heard an inner voice say, 'Is that what you think we're doing?' I said, 'That's what I've been taught. You're sucking them into hell.' And that voice said, 'Can't you see they're already there? That's hell. You created that.'"

Pearson believed that God was telling him hell is the creation of man on earth.


Another interesting thought - Pearson believes that God told him there is no hell. I wonder if this is an example of how a theology that practices and preaches that "God told me" can lead to doctrinal aberration?

From 2003-
TULSA, Okla. - Bishop Carlton Pearson, the nationally prominent evangelical preacher, has already stirred one controversy for preaching the doctrine of inclusion - that everyone is saved no matter what they do.

He’s about to light another fuse.

Pearson, founder and pastor of Tulsa’s Higher Dimensions Family Church, now says he believes “it is reasonable” that Satan himself will go to heaven. It’s possible, he says, that God could have made a mistake in condemning Satan to eternity in hell.

“Is God not big enough to change the devil?” Pearson said in an interview. “I can conceive of the devil bowing down and repenting to God, saying, ‘I competed with You, but I was wrong. I’m sorry.’ “

Asked if that “confession” would be enough for God to forgive Satan and allow him into heaven, Pearson replied, “He (the devil) came from heaven.”


This is not intended to be a "let's blast Carlton Pearson" post, and please don't let the comments become that. Rather I am interested in the wrongness of his thinking, and the subsequent response of other Christians.

Personally, I see him as a victim of a theology that teaches that "God speaks new revelation" and him allowing circumstances and personal human reason to trump the Word of God.

Trackbacks:

Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/4908.

Comments on "Universalism Takes One Down":
1. nhe - 10/09/2008 2:49 pm CDT

I would be curious to know why Pearson thinks the early church suffered such intense persecution.

Would he say that the early church just completely missed the point and suffered needlessly? Because surely a gospel of inclusion would not be offensive, rather, the early church folks would have been the life of the party.

Its as if when God spoke to Pearson, he said "Paul had it all wrong, let me tell you what's really going on"........yeah, THAT happenned.

2. joyce - 10/09/2008 7:19 pm CDT

The problem is not so much "God told me" as "I think God is telling me such-and-so, and now I need to go check that against the Bible to make sure it was Him I was hearing". I seems to me (and I'm not familiar with him other than through your post here) that that was what he did not do. Had he done so, and considered the Bible valuable for correction and training, he would have realized he was a victim of the enemy.

3. Roy - 10/10/2008 8:43 am CDT

Pearson´s rebellious sin (so says not Roy but,eg, Ro 1:20ff)hinges on a willful denial.

First: he begins to approximate, but does not really recognize how terribly awful we ought think God´s wrath is. Those who denounce God as a big meanie with lots of conceit sometimes have a slight grasp of the biblical hell. But only slight. Only when we snap to the idea that all the illustrations, the most clever metaphors simply do not do more than suggest a hint of the total terror of hell. Ponder a bit the contradiction of a creature continuing to endure even for a microsecond the infinite wrath of God gives but a glimmer of the fires of hell, where God will preserve that He may never cease destroying. The mind of this creature cannot grasp either the dimensions of hell...

or, Second: the wonder of grace that would warn me. In the most graphic language. Repeatedly. Pleaing with me to flee. Offering refuge. No, not merely offering refuge, but providing it at unspeakable cost. What would motivate God to do these things? In my saner moments I realize that I have no hold on Him, that I can make no claim of deserving anything, that He can do as He wishes and never err no matter that He chose to create and destroy me. But instead, love. Pearson and Co. scorn grace, spitting in the face of God and openly defying Him.

That is, Third, Pearson completely minimizes (what a juxtaposition of 2 words) God´s being. If God is indeed God rather than god, how could hell have any different characteristics than those of which the Bible tells? Certainly hell is awful. Because God is. Because He did not result from the mind of men. Because He is Creator, not creature. He deserves glory. Indeed, ¨For of Him, and through Him, and to Him are all things, to whom be the glory forever¨.

4. Karl - 10/10/2008 11:39 am CDT

I agree with Joyce. There are plenty who believe that God still speaks today, but who would add that God will not speak anything which is contradictory to his word revealed in scripture and the person of Jesus Christ.

Not weighing what he thinks he has heard against scripture is this man's primary failure here IMO, not his belief that God might actually speak to him.

5. Gina - 10/10/2008 1:35 pm CDT

This is the kind of things that happen when people stop believing in the authority of scripture. I think that is one of the biggest challenges facing the church today. All kinds of error can be allowed in if you think the bible is just a book written by fallible men who were a product of the culture in which they lived.

6. Eloquorius - 10/10/2008 6:10 pm CDT

"Personally, I see him as a victim of a theology that teaches that God speaks new revelation and..." Stop. There is no "and". Just the first part of your statement pegs it. I've been open that I used to be Pentecostal and been a part of groups where the uber-spiritual were the ones where God is yakking at them like a junior high girl on unlimited minutes. Gary Gilley has dealt with this extensively, notably in "The Lord Told Me – I Think!". I know many defend it, as did I back in the day, but the disproportionate source of current heretical movements surrounds those who claim to receive extra-biblical revelation; i.e., Charismatic/Pentecostal. They turn nine shades of red when I say this, but it's truly rooted in severe disregard for the sufficiency and primacy of Scripture. Example: Recently I visited a church, not knowing their position. The pastor invited such: "Does anyone have a 'word' from the Lord, or even, well, just a Scripture?" Yeah, "just a Scripture", and "word from the Lord did NOT mean Scripture. That is exactly the approach that tells the sheep that the goodies aren't in Scripture (which is relegated to merely fact-checking and "inspirational" status) but the meat is in the personalized, customized, just-for-you-and-the-congregation "revelation" via some dim voice that you're never sure you can trust 100%. So yes, as one that's been there, I can concur that the "theology that teaches that God speaks new revelation" is VERY much to blame. Just my $0.03

Leave a Comment:
Name:
URL: (optional)
Email: (optional - will not be published)
Comment: