- David F. Wells
What are the worst movies you've ever seen?
Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/4941.
are straight to DVD releases and Hallmark Channel TV movies valid candidates, or do these have to be movies that were actually released to big screen?
In any case, my candidate is
THOMAS AND THE MAGIC RAILROAD
one of the worst ever transitions from successful TV show to studio release
Bwah ha ha! In my case, it's usually whatever I watched last. For today that would be Bryan Loves You, truly one of the worst DVD releases this year.
Some of you are going to be irrate, but that Bruce Willis movie - Unbreakable. I keep reading how many of you love it, which makes me wonder if I didn't miss something and need to go back and watch it again???
Some Jeff Goldblum movie, I think it was called Mr. Freeze. Oh my goodness, 2 hours of my life I will never get back.
GinH, yes, you missed it. "Unbreakable" is incredible.
You have to "read" the movie as well as watch it. :-)
It probably also helps if you have some familiarity with and affection for the medium of comic books.
Never heard of that Goldblum movie, I don't think.
---
Andrew, please elaborate on your "History" aversion.
It was one of those where I just turned it off when it was over and was like, "ugh." It's been a while, and I've tried not to think about it, but I'll do my best to remember plot points and explain as best I can.
First, I felt the ending was done very poorly. I thought it was rushed, I didn't quite understand it, and as much as it tried, it wasn't suspenseful.
Second, the utter lack of redemption was so disappointing, because the movie had me really liking Viggo Mortensen's character at first. I ended up hating him. The fact that he had this dark past was one thing, but the fact that he turned back to it at the end, without remorse, and seemingly without moral conflict was a real turn-off to me.
Third, the whole sex (rape?) on the stairs thing was totally gratuitous, thrown in for shock-value, did nothing for character development and did nothing to advance the plot. It was really hard for me to like it after that.
I went in with high expectations, but just came out feeling cheated of 9 bucks.
It's been a while, and I'm probably missing some key element to understanding it, but that's what I remember.
And GinH,
Your comment made me cry a little.
Shark Boy and Lava Girl?
Nightmare #3?
Killer Tomatoes #2?
Take care & God bless
WF
Definitely, Maybe (Does it count, if after the first 15 minutes, you get up, eject the DVD and put it back in its envelope without having seen the whole thing?)
Define "seen". :)
"Nicolas Cage as a vampire" movie. Yipes.
Batman and Robin. (This is only amplified by my status as a huge Batman fan.)
Gigli...Don't ask.
Face/Off
The Holiday (with Jack Black, Cameron Diaz, Kate Winslet, not to be confused with Queen Latifah's pretty decent movie, Last Holiday)
What Dreams May Come
City of Angels
Hook
Gretchen from Lifenut, can I take issue with your Holiday hate? Surely 40% of it (Jack Black being sweet, Kate Winslet having gumption and that wonderful little old Jewish guy whose name I forget being sprightly and witty) was a funny, intelligent, old-fashioned and sweet-hearted romcom, no?
Only the other 60% (Cameron Diaz and Jude Law) was morally poisonous, formulaic, drippy, meaningless tosh of the worst order. ;o)
Credit where it's due, eh?
The worst film I have ever seen was The Time Machine, starring Him That Used To Be In Neighbours and Irish pop sensation Samantha Mumba. That was a breathtakingly bad movie - though probably not least because I have ambitions to be an H. G. Wells geek and I love the book.
Ok, I wish someone had warned me about The Happening BEFORE I got cozy in the airplane three weeks ago and thought it might be a good one to watch. By then it was too late to switch over to Iron Man!
In my opinion, AI was HORRIBLE! Some friends and I went on my birthday whenever it came out and we were speechless at the end. The only thing one of us managed to say was, "That's the weirdest movie I've ever seen in my LIFE!"
Fifty First Dates (I know, I know, it was 'sweet', a 'good popcorn flick', full of charming 'SNL humor'. . . bottom line, it stunk on ICE)
Patch Adams (Am I the only one in the world who hasn't liked anything Robin Williams has done since Aladdin?)
The Time Machine (yeah, that was bad)
Out of Africa (fell asleep)
Fern Gully (another Robin Williams)
and many more . . . :-)
Oh, and Hook would have been better had it not starred Robin Williams.
I knew I liked you, BN. :-)
I admit I've never seen good will hunting.
Actually, I thought the premise was pretty good. :-)
Even you don't like the execution, don't you find the idea of someone who has to woo the person he loves all over again from scratch every day fairly charming?
I even used this premise as an illustration once, talking about how we must have the gospel preached to us every day in some form b/c every day we wake up having "forgotten" it and ready to worship ourselves all over again.
I thought the premise was disgusting. Deceit, trying to seduce an addled and mentally handicapped girl. Walrus vomit. Homosexuality. Bleaugh.
Hey, I was going to say Ferngully too. Terrible. Another cartoon, an early Don Bluth, that's terrible is Thumbelina. I may watch An American Carol, and it may be stupid, but I'll have to see.
Nights in Rodanthe-Bad chick flick
The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou-I wanted them to sink and die in the first fifteen
The recent X-Files was so bad it wasn't almost like a youtube someone made in their garage.
And these, because of their sheer over-rated-ness and undeserved hoopla-ness:
Dark Knight
The Last Indiana Jones mess
and just to bug everyone:
Star Wars (Sorry, but I never fell for it.)
Oh, one more:
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
I knew I was in trouble when the opening train scene reminded me of The Apple Dumpling Gang robberies.
Our family and extended family went and exit reviews became so heated we had to draw an imaginary line on the lobby carpet and people took a side.
In general these days, there is enough information out there to keep us from seeing a bad movie.....but a few do still slip through.
My "least favorite":
Contact
Message in a Bottle
The Mist
Bruce Almighty
The Descent
To the person who listed Unbreakable - see it again and view it as a Superhero origin story with each of David's family members learning to assume their roles in his life. Unbreakable is one of my top 5 all-time - it is SOOOO NOT about the twist at the end..........it stands alone as the best "prequel to a Superhero" ever.
Andrew - yes
Michele - I disagree on Dark Knight but THANK YOU for reminding me . . . the worst three movies EVER made, when it comes to tossing away the potential they had to be awesome: Star Wars Episode 1 (passable), Star Wars Episode 2 (ridiculous. It grated, like sand. Not like Padme's skin, which is smooth. Like sand, in your underwear). Star Wars Episode 3 (TERRIBLE! It defined terrible. Worst movie ever, and 3 1/2 hours long to boot. AWFUL. Stinkomatic.).
"Is the idea itself of someone's significant other losing their memory every day repulsive?"
No, that would be sweet. What movie are we talking about? FFD was about a stranger losing her memory, and the amoral cipher who decided "hey, maybe she'll have sex with me if I keep manipulating her every day". Of course, we walked out of it in the middle so I might have missed all the good parts.
A similar (somewhat) movie that was SO much better - Groundhog Day.
The singularly worst film I've ever seen is Blue Lagoon. It is with great pride that I can say that I didn't have to pay a red cent to see it.
I would equate Blue Lagoon with torture.
I also walked out of a Monty Python movie but I don't remember the title.
I gotta agree with Michelle on Chronicle's TLTWATW.........not because it was awful, but because it was so far below what Peter Jackson would have done with it.......I felt like it was Disney-ized for my protection - Disney wanting to protect me from too much gospel symbolism - I was HUGELY disappointed - but I was definitely in the minority among friends and family.
British Nathan---Cameron Diaz was so awful in The Holiday that nothing can redeem it in my view. She is completely overrated in any film, but especially bad here. I love the rest of the cast---all consistently talented. She drags them down. I really wanted to like it, but I hated it. Surprised me.
Ella Enchanted
The Bow (Korean movie)
Pretty Woman
that one with Harry Connick Junior as a serial killer (which was so yucky I'm not even going to bother Googling the name)
any Star Wars movie starring Hayden Christiansen
and the winner...
Se7en (it was well made, but without question the most horrible, why-in-the-world-did-I-ever-sit-through-this, make-me-want-to-die movie I've ever seen)
Yes, nhe, if only Jackson and not Disney had gotten a hold of the Narnia books first, oh if only!
And I still hope that Steven Speilberg will find a copy of The Hiding Place, read it and make a great movie. What a story that needs to be told again and again.
Oh yeah, another stinker that is supposed to be significant, but nobody got:
Pi
and the one with Bjorn, I think it was called "Dancer in the Dark" or something. I thought something was wrong with her, like she was mentally retarded, truly, until the end. But, when they hung her I knew she must just be wierd.
"What About Bob" is the only one I don't agree with so far.
Bill,
We saw 50 first dates...the whole thing. I hated it too. But I'm with Jared. It was the execution, not the premise. It was the premise that made me see it in spite of your warnings.
The gutter humor was horrible, and totally ruined it for me. The "sleeping with her" thing stops pretty quickly. He falls in love with her, and just tries to win her heart every day. It's pretty cool. I hate the movie mostly because of it's wasted potential. It could have been awesome.
Just for the crowd here I will be renting Unbreakable again and watching it with new eyes.
How could you hate Ella Enchanted?? I thought it was adorable.
How could I have forgotten Pretty Woman? HATE that movie - but then I don't like anything with Julia Roberts in it. Period. I'll just say all her movies - except Sleeping with the Enemy. Liked that one, but then, someone was stalking Julia Roberts.
If Jackson had done the Narnia films, I think we'd have movies that were better cinematically but the stories would be even more stripped of Christian content and reinterpreted to fit the mores and worldview of Jackson and his writers.
Listening to the director's and writers' commentary on the LOTR DVD's it's pretty clear PJ and the writers just don't "get" JRRT's worldview and felt pretty free to reinterpret the story and the characters when their worldview clashed with JRRT's.
I'm sure there are hundreds of worse movies that I've never seen, but of movies I have, the worst would be 'Adaptation' and 'Boomerang'.
Honorable mention to all Robin Willians (here, here, Bill) and Eddie Murphy movies ever made, most of which I fortunately haven't seen.
Oh, and 'Blair Witch Project'. How could I forget that awfulness?
And for most depressingly bad, 'Star Trek: The Motion Picture' (although Wrath of Khan made up for it and more).
I strongly disagree Karl......I know that Jackson is not a Christian, but I thought he did a great job with the gospel elements in the LOTR films AND King Kong. IMHO, image bearers who do not know Christ have made some very redemptive films - see Durabont/King in Shawshank and Green Mile.
There are small moments of gospel/redemptive brilliance in the LOTR films that Jackson CHOSE to put in (I could be specific, but that's for another thread). Now, did he know those were "gospel" moments? - nah, but he sees what good storytelling is - the gospel is the greatest story of all - and any great story has gospel elements......and the wonderful thing in God's economy is, you don't have to be regenerated to see it or appreciate it.
Worst movie I've ever seen: Johnny Memonic (SP). I'm pretty sure I spelled that wrong, but too lazy to look it up. Anyway, horrible movie.
Also, Clockwork Orange. There I am, walking around blockbuster with a good friend, trying to find something to rent. We can't find anything good that we both like. We come across Clockwork Orange. Neither of us know ANYTHING about the movie, other than it is a well-known "classic", in a sense. So we figure, what the heck.
Yeah, um...won't make that mistake again. Geez.
Blair Witch Project- I kept yelling "Just shut up and walk!" I wanted to kill them with sharp pointy sticks.
I think they made two of those things.
I had fun reading this! Maybe you guys could start a "best movies" thread to even it out.
As a teen with some buddies I once rented a film we all were hoping would be forbidden-horror called BloodLust. The jacket was hand-drawn. Turned out to be a spliced-up foreign-language Jeckle/Hyde story (out of sequence) with some odd homoerotic overtones. By far the worst movie ever MADE. But that's not the game you're playing.
I'd vote on "Plan 9" which is delightfully awful, and "Independence Day" as a personal least-favorite.
We'll probably have to agree to disagree nhe. But a couple of points:
In the context of discussing what Jackson would do with Narnia I think you have to distinguish "redemptive films" from the specifically Christian worldview in Narnia and, to a more muted extent, in LOTR. Where a theme is generally "redemptive" the secular director might be all for it. Where it is uniquely Christian, the moveimaker tends to balk. Even the Disney makers of Narnia changed/muted a few things in that vein, and I think PJ would have done even more.
I am in complete agreement with the idea that pagan film makers might - and often do - make redemptive films that have gospel echoes or implications. And I'd agree even that the LOTR films have a good many of such moments - just fewer than the books did. Because PJ and his writers changed some aspects of JRRT's stories and characterizations when their worldview clashed with that of JRRT. Have you listened to their commentary on the DVD's? It's entertaining and insightful and they're brilliant and made a great trilogy of movies, but at times they just totally miss Tolkien, or else they get him but don't like what he's saying and decided to substitute their own worldview.
Karl - I haven't heard the commentary, but would like to......I just think generally that "pound for pound" more gospel moments are found explicitly in the LOTR films than the Narnia films (and not just because they're longer). I think Disney does a better job of neutering the gospel than Jackson does.
Jackson just tells the story better, his villains are far more evil than the ones in Narnia, which makes the contrast starker, and the tension more real. To me, that is "more gospel" also. His heros are far more noble and better developed as characters. Narnia feels de-clawed by comparison.
I don't doubt that Jackson's world view often collides with Tolkien, but Jackson just generally makes a richer, more redemptive film than Disney does, and I'd much prefer seeing him at the helm of the Narnia films. Even if he missed some key gospel elements, the tone would be richer, and the experience more redemptive.
Jared, I missed the first review of The Happening, but I read the second one . . . about a week too late! Oh well. We all make mistakes in life, yeah?
Before I ever saw Narnia, a friend of mine in his late 40's was describing it to me. He said, in all seriousness and without (intentional) irony: "You should go see it. It's like The Passion of The Christ: The Animal Version"
I'll go ahead and be the jerk who points out that the Left Behind movie sucked. But saying that kind of feels like beating up a dog with one leg. Too easy, and somehow lacking in pity.
So my wife and I go to a movie with another couple, thinking we're going to see the Crowe & DiCaprio movie. But no: we wind up watching
Fireproof.
Saw it last weekend and felt like I needed a shower when I walked out. It was like I was watching porn (not that I'm an expert on that), only the acting wasn't as good. Just some bad notions about what the Christian life is like.
And who was the guy playing Little Kirkie's Dad? Unbelievably horrible. I wondered if Kirk didn't intentionally surround himself with actors worse than himself so he could look good.
$7 and 2 hours I'll never get back.
Heh - seems like people love that movie or hate it (fireproof).
A good friend today told me he saw it and loved it (ditto my daughter).
I figure I'd probably like it, but haven't seen it yet.
Seriously, though - I understand you didn't like it (many commenters on this site thought it was terrible) - but Porn? in what way?
Wait, wait, Jackson really messed up some scenes -- and I think intentionally messed them up when they had elements he recognized as spiritual. Elrond healing Frodo at Rivendell? Looked like a shaman. The Exorcism of Saruman from King Theoden? Campy as Benny Hinn.
And then one of the writers was fighting back and tried to put overt Christianity into the scenes she helped write (Arwen's explicit reference to 'grace' after crossing the ford and ditching the Nazgul) -- Tolkien had consciously rewritten LOTR so that the spiritual references were never so explicit.
Jackson did ok with the parts you could hardly get rid of: the taming of Smeagol, Sam's steadfastness, the "wise v. foolish" contrasts of Saruman and Gandalf.
But if the spirituality was of the type he could recognize and detect as spirituality, he made the scene lame, and I suspect deliberately lame.
Or was I the only one who thought that the Elrond/shaman bit and the Exorcism of Saruman were badly done?
Or was I the only one who thought that the Elrond/shaman bit and the Exorcism of Saruman were badly done?
I'm not at all the foremost Tolkien scholar in this neck of the woods, but I think I might speak for at least one of them when I say this: Jackson didn't do a perfect job, and there were some things he did that verged on heresy (the ring going to Osgiliath... blasphemy), but one thing he did right, and perhaps better than any director could have done, was capture the epic scope of the books. There are epics and then there are Epics, and Jackson made the latter. Just because you have an epic story doesn't mean you can make an epic movie out of it (and anyone who saw Troy, Kingdom of Heaven or Alexander knows that).
You're right on Theoden for sure. Besides getting the exorcism wrong, they messed up his character pretty badly (at least in the second movie...he wasn't so bad in the third). But while I agree that Jackson didn't do a perfect job, and I'm sure he didn't fully get Tolkien's overall message, he did about as good of a job as anyone could have.
LOL, don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed the Rings movies, & own extended editions of all 3 of them. I think Jackson was truest to Tolkien's vision in the first movie -- he seemed to understand what Tolkien was doing with hobbits.
The battles ... on the one hand, Jackson's are the best battle scenes I've seen, bar none. On the other hand, he did let them take over the film at some point, and to Tolkien the war was never the point. In fact, for Tolkien, part of the point was that while war may become necessary, it can never be enough; in some ways you can hardly tell the difference between Gondor and Mordor (hence the deliberately over-similar names) at some points.
Take care & God bless
Anne / WF
I completely agree Anne - my contention is only that the LOTR films are more redemptive and richer with gospel implications than the Narnia films.
Jackson missed on plenty, but he captured overall tone and scope very well - both of which I felt were sorely lacking in the Narnia films......granted the redemptive elements in the LOTR films aren't as explicit or as evident as we'd like - but they are there.
Other than the "hit you over the head, they're so obvious" moments in Narnia (like Aslan rising from the dead) I felt the characters were flat and did not display their "character qualities" from the books the way the LOTR characters did. Sam, Aragorn, Arwen, Gandolf, etc., are much more richly and accurately drawn than the one-dimensional lifeless characters in the Narnia films.......its really about tone.
I'm late to this party, but after reading through the comments I can't believe noone mentioned Cocktail! And for my foreign film nomination - My Life as a Dog.
OK. Nobody's mentioned "Napoleon Dynamite". Am I the only one who despised that movie? I didn't get it. It made me really uncomfortable. Ugh.
"Left Behind" was also pretty bad, but I was predisposed to dislike it because of the bad theology.
I loved the LOTR films. They weren't perfect, especially the part about Faramir wanting the Ring, but they captured the feel of Middle Earth better than anything I could have imagined.
Blessings,
Catherine

I'll go:
The Happening
Godzilla 1985
the Van Damme movie that takes place in the bayou
Batman and Robin
I'm sure I'll think of some more.