"It may be useful to remember that Christian faith is ultimately dependent upon what actually happened rather than upon the views of historians."

- I. Howard Marshall
The Good Ole Days Weren't So Good For Ota Benga

Ota Benga 1904

From a column in yesterday's Wall Street Journal. (Deja Vu by Cynthia Crossen, Feb. 6, 2006, B1)

For a few yards of cloth and some salt, Samuel Verner, an American missionary and explorer, bought a young man named Ota Benga in the Belgian Congo in 1903. Ota Benga was a Pygmy who had been enslaved by another tribe. Mr. Verner was working under a contract to the St. Louis World's Fair. He was supposed to bring several Pygmies to America for a living display of the stages of evolution, and then return them to Africa.

Three years later, with the World's Fair over and Mr. Verner in financial straits, Ota Benga was placed in a new home: the monkey house at the Bronx Zoo.

The story of Ota Benga is a sad and maddening example of the kinds of blunders that occurred at a time when the theory of Darwinism was rationalizing the evolution of humanity. To the thousands of spectators in St. Louis in the summer of 1904, the Department of Anthropology's exhibits of Pygmies, American Indians, Filipinos and Asians living in reconstructed huts and villages seemed to prove that man had indeed ascended from savages to masters of civilization.

The "guests" as the men, women and children on display were euphemistically called probably weren't so impressed: The Americans had a penchant for stealing pieces of the exhibits, and they also threw lighted cigars and other unwanted items into the displays. When teh chilly days of autumn arrived, the Pygmies weren't permitted to wear warm clothes becaues that wouldn't have been authentic.

At the conclusion of the World's Fair, Mr. Verner, as promised, returned the Pygmies to their African villages. But Ota Benga's home had been destroyed and his family was dead. He decided to throw in his lot with Mr. Verner who was shipping a cargo of African collectibles - including chimpanzees, snakes, beetles and sculpted ivory - back to the U.S. for sale to museums and zoos.

Unable to make a quick deal, and in such financial difficulty that he began writing bad checks, Mr. Verner asked the American Museum of Natural History in New York to store his collection while he looked for a buyer. He also asked the museum to house Ota Benga, who was ill equipped to fend for himself in the U.S.

Ota Benga lived at the museum for a few weeks, but he soon became restless and tried to leave. No longer wanting the responsibility of overseeing him, museum officials offered Ota Benga to the Bronx Zoological Park, whose director, William Hornaday, recognized a unique business opportunity.

At first, Ota Benga was permitted to walk around the park's grounds freely. Soon, however, he was locked in a cage in the monkey house, often in the company of an orangutan named Dohong. Bones were scattered around the cage to make Ota Benga's sharpened teeth seem more savage. "To a generation raised on talk of that absentee star of evolution, the missing link, the point of Dohong and Ota disporting in the monkey house was obvious," wrote Mr. Verner's grandson, Phillips Verner Bradford, and Harvey Blume in their 1992 book, "Ota: The Pygmy in the Zoo."

Thousands of spectators flocked to the exhibit on the first weekend, and the New York Times reported that "the joint man-and-monkey exhibition was the most interesting in Bronx Park." While the spectacle provided plenty of laughs, the Times added, "it is probably a good thing that Benga doesn't think very deeply...If he did it isn't likely that he was very proud of himself when he woke in the morning and found himself under the same roof with the orangutans and monkeys."

The Colored Baptist Ministers' Conference, among others, quickly denounced the "degrading exhibition." "Our race is depressed enough," said the Rev. James Gordon, "without exhibiting one of us with the apes. We think we are worthy of being considered human beings with souls." Gordon also objected to the exhibit as a demonstration of Darwinism. "The Darwinian theory is absolutely opposed to Christianity," he said.

Mr. Hornaday, the park's director, vehemently defended the exhibit. "We are taking excellent care of the little fellow," he said. "He has one of the best rooms in the primate house." And the Times opined, "It is absurd to moan over the imagined humiliation and degradation he is suffering... The idea that men are all much alike except as they have had or lacked opportunities for getting an education out of books is now far out of date."

But the controversy didn't die down, and Ota Benga, then in his mid-20's, soon decided to leave the zoo, spending the next few years at orphanges for black children in New York. In 1910, he moved to a Baptist seminary in Lynchburg, Va., where he did odd jobs as well as hunted and fished. His sharpened teeth were capped, and he changed his name to Otto Bingo.

Six years later, in March 1916, Ota Benga used a stolen revolver to kill himself.

In an article in the Lynchburg News, Mr. Hornaday was quoted as saying he wasn't surprised by Ota Benga's suicide. "Evidently," Mr. Hornaday said, "he felt that he would rather die than work for a living."


From Creation Research Quarterly Journal:
The incident clearly reveals the racism of evolutionary theory and the extent that the theory gripped the hearts and minds of scientists and journalists in the late 1800s. As humans move away from this time in history, we can more objectively look back at the horrors that evolutionary theory has brought to society of which this story is a poignant example.


More about Ota Benga's time at the zoo:
Ota was next encouraged to spend as much time as he wanted inside the monkey house. He was even given a bow and arrow and was encouraged to shoot it is part of "an exhibit." Ota was soon locked in his enclosure-and when he was let out of the monkey house, 'the crowd stayed glued to him- and a keeper stayed close by' (Bradford and Blume, 1992, p. 180). In the meantime, the publicity began-on September 9, the New York Times headline screamed, "bushman shares a cage with the Bronx Park apes." Although the director, Dr. Homaday, insisted thatt he was merely offeringan "intriguing exhibit" for the public's edification, he "apparently saw no difference between a wild beast and the little Black man; [and] for the first time in any American zoo, a human being was displayed in a cage. Benga was given cage-mates to keep him company in his captivity-a parrot and an Orangutan named Dohong" (Sifakis, 1984, p. 253).

A contemporary account stated that Ota was "not much taller than an orangutan . . their heads are much alike, and both grin in the same way when pleased" (Bradford and Blume, 1992, p.181). Benga also came over from Africa with a fine young chimpanzee" which Mr. Verner also deposited "in the ape collection at the Primates House" (Hornaday,1906, p. 302). Hornaday's enthusiasm for his new primate exhibit was reflected in an article that he wrote which begins as follows: On September 9, a genuine African Pygmy, belonging to the sub-race commonly miscalled 'the dwarfs'. . .Ota Benga is a well developed little man, with a good head, bright eyes and a pleasing countenance. He is not hairy and is not covered by the 'downy fell' described by some explorers. . . .He is happiest when at work, making something with his hands (1906, p. 301).


The purpose of the exhibit was to show evolution: from ape to sub-human.

That he was on display was indisputable: a sign was posted on the enclosure which said "The African Pygmy, 'Ota Benga." Age 23 years. Height 4 feet 11 inches. Weight 103 pounds. Brought from the Kasai River, Congo Free State, South Central Africa by Dr. Samuel P. Verner. Exhibited each afternoon during September" (New York Times, Sept. 10, 1906, p. 1). And what an exhibit it was.

The orangutan imitated the man. The man imitated the monkey. They hugged, they let go, flopped into each other's arms. Dohong [the orangutan] snatched the woven straw off Ota's head and placed it on his own.... the crowd hooted and applauded...the children squealed with delight. To adults there was a more serious side to the display. Something about the boundary condition of 'being human was exemplified in that cage. Somewhere man shaded into non-human. Perhaps if they look hard enough the moment of transition might be seen.... to a generation raised on talk of that absentee star of evolution, the Missing Link, the point of Dohong and Ota disporting in the monkey house was obvious (Bradford and Blume, 1992, p. 181).

It was also obvious to a New York Times reporter who stated "the pygmy was not much taller than the orangutan, and one had a good opportunity to study their points of resemblance. Their heads are much alike, andd both grin in the same way when pleased" (Sept. 10, 1906, p. 1). That he was made much fun of is also indisputable: he was once, given a pair of shoes which over and over again the crowd laughed at him as he sat in mute admiration of them" (New York Times, Sept. 10, 1906, p.1). Another New York Times article by one of the editors, after studying the situation, penned the following:

Ota Benga ... is a normal specimen of his race or tribe, with a brain as much developed as are those of its other members. Whether they are held to be illustrations of arrested development, and really closer to the anthropoid apes than the other African savages, or whether they are viewed as the degenerate descendants of ordinary negroes, they are of equal interest to the student of ethnology, and can be studied with profit.... As for Benga himself, he is probably enjoying himself as well -as he could anywhere in this country, and it is absurd to make moan over the imagined humiliation and degradation he is suffering. The pygmies are a fairly efficient people in their native forests....but they are very low in the human scale, and the suggestion that Benga should be in a school instead of a cage ignores the high probability that school would be a place of torture to him and one from which he could draw no advantage whatever. The idea that men are all much alike except as they have had or lacked opportunities for getting an education out of books is now far out of date. With training carefully adapted to his mental limitations, this pygmy would doubtless be taught many things. . .but there is no chance that he could learn anything in an ordinary school. (September 11, 1906, p. 6).


So what happened to Ota Benga?
He became a Christian, was baptized, and his English vocabulary rapidly improved. He also learned how to read-and occasionally attended classes at a Lynchburg seminary. He was popular among the boys, and learned several sports such as baseball (at which he did quite well). He later ceased attending classes and became a laborer on the Obery farm for 10 dollars a month plus room and board (Bradford and Blume,1992, p. 204). The school concluded that his lack of education progress was because of his African 'attitude" when actually probably "his age was against his development. It was simply impossible to put him in a class to receive instructions ... that would be of any advantage to him" (Ward, 1992, p. 14). He had enormous curiosity and a drive to learn, but preferred performance tests as opposed to the multiple choice kind.

Every effort was made to help him blend in (even his teeth were capped to help him look more normal), and although he seemingly had adjusted, inwardly he had not. Several events and changes that occurred there caused him to become despondent. He checked on the price of steamship tickets to Africa, and concluded that he would never have enough money to purchase one. He had not heard from Verner in a while, and did not know bow to contact him. Later employed as a laborer in a tobacco factory in Lynchburg, VA, he grew increasingly depressed, hostile, irrational, and forlorn. When people spoke to him, they noticed that he had tears in his eyes when he told them he wanted to go home. Concluding that he would never be able to return to his native land, on March 20, 1916 Benga committed suicide with a revolver (Sanborn, 1916). In Ward's words: "Ota ... removed the caps from his teeth. When his small companions asked him to lead them into the woods again, he turned them away. Once they were safely out of sight, he shot himself . . (1992, p. 14).


More info and still more info on this horrible story.

People talk about the good ole days, but I say they weren't so good for human beings like Ota Benga. The past isn't as good as you think it is.

Do not say, "Why were the old days better than these?" For it is not wise to ask such questions. Ecclesiastes 7:10


Trackbacks:

Trackback URL: http://thinklings.org/bloo.trackback.php/2906.

Comments on "The Good Ole Days Weren't So Good For Ota Benga":
1. Shrode - 02/07/2006 11:15 am CST

Sorry this was so long folks. I guess that's why there's why there's no comments? No one has the patience to make it that far! :) I just got all fired up about this story and didn't want to leave anything out. At least please read the first few paragraphs, skip the middle and read the conclusion.

Thanks!

2. Stacy - 02/07/2006 11:38 am CST

I read every word...this is awful! Why have I never encountered this story in history books or books about the evolution theory?

3. Nathan - 02/07/2006 12:48 pm CST

My word, the things we do. Seems a little learning's just as dangerous a thing among scientists as for anyone else. How horrible we can be, and what theories we can use and abuse to defend our snobbery.

4. Raindream - 02/07/2006 4:03 pm CST

I read the whole thing, Shrode, and haven't taken the time to comment. My first thought was to bash evolutionists. This is only one story of how Darwinian theory has supported racism, and I don't see why it shouldn't still. People with degrees still believe this kind of thing or worse. PETA applies Darwinian theory well too to argue against eating animals.

But my second thought was to wonder if this horrible story was an aberration among evolutionists and not a good application of Darwin's ideas. We should avoid pointing to radicals or misguided fools as examples of errors in a philosophy or theory. We should point to the strong examples and the proper applications of theories when showing how they still fail. So do you think this is a good example of where evolution takes us?

And further, is Mayor Ray Nagin the real missing link?

*oh, I seem to have misplaced my laugh track*

5. Danny Kaye - 02/08/2006 3:07 am CST

Uh-oh. I think I'm about to be banned from the Thinklings site. But I have a confession to make:

I'm one of those. You know. A Christian who believes in evolution. There! I've said it.

[ducks to avoid the piercing glares]

So needless to say, I don't think this is so much a story about how messed up evolutionists can be as it is how messed up people can be. (After all, haven't even Christians done some pretty stupid and hurtful things to back up arguments?)

Honestly, I fought to read the story. I wanted to stop. But I kept telling myself, "You need to read this". It wasn't that the story was boring or uninteresting. It was that my emotions were being effected in a way that a happy-go-lucky person doesn't want them to be.

I don't stick my head in the sand and ignore the awful things that happen in the world. But I don't go out of my way to hunt down the stories either. When one comes across my path like this, I just assume I need to read it.

Thanks Shrode.

6. Levi - 02/08/2006 5:03 am CST

I don't the point of the story was to show how evolutionists are somehow worse human beings than Christians but to show how, if followed to its logical conclusion, atheistic Evolution strips humanity of dignity and sanctity.

After all, Hilter was very Evolutionary.

7. Kevin - 02/08/2006 5:16 am CST

Read every word yesterday, Shrode.

Then I read it again.

I still cannot come up with anything to say. I cannot dis' the evolutionists. There, but for the grace of God go I. 100 years ago, would I have been one of the people who plunked down a buck to see the half-ape boy? Would I have told myself that it was honest, scientific inquiry? Would I question today whether someone bears the image of God if it were sold to me just right?

In the book "Blink" the author tells of a test that measures your intuitive racism. I could find it if anyone asked, but he basically says, "Forget about it. You are going to fail this test, and nothing you do can change your score. We all rationalize that we are not racist, but our hearts of hearts, we are." It came back to mind as I read this. These people were rationalizing, but so do I.

Lord have mercy.

Thanks for posting.

8. Nathan - 02/09/2006 3:18 am CST

Don't worry, Danny, you're not alone! I thought about mentioning it myself but thought I'd do a bad job and detract from the story - which you didn't, by the way, so I'm not shouting at you in a roundabout way =o)

I quite agree. This is about how science gets used and abused by people to rationalise the irrational, sinful things we'd like to do anyway. I fear Kevin's questions in comment no. 7 would apply to me too. After all, I sometimes find myself choosing to watch Big Brother, Survivor etc. for some kind of spurious sociological reasons when there's really nothing more to them than pleasure at watching messed up people be weirder than oneself, and that's WRONG WRONG WRONG.

9. Ellen - 02/09/2006 4:35 am CST

On somewhat the same line, here's a book I got a while ago.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/019515679X/104-1471260-4673557?v=glance&n=283155

10. dbd - 02/09/2006 2:23 pm CST

Of course the whole phrase "survival of the fittest" is confusing and misleading.

A large, strong animal isn't "the fittest" for an environment with very scarce food, for example--a small animal that requires few resources is the best "fit" for such a place.

The idea of adaptation to environment implies, in itself, no hierarchy of higher and lower forms--that is a much older idea, which has been imposed on science just as it has sometimes been imposed on religion (my own grandmother, for example, used the story of Japheth, Shem and Ham to justify her racism).

11. jez - 02/09/2006 3:07 pm CST

I don't think Darwin invented racism, or the "freak show" tent in fairs. It is a poor scientist who does not recognise a living human. The public were part of a giant kind of Milgram experiment. Very sad.

Wouldn't a zoo-keeper take better care of his monkeys? Keep them warm at least?

12. Bethany - 02/11/2006 4:13 pm CST

I read it too. Every word. I just didn't really know what to say....it's too sad. :(

13. Shrode - 02/12/2006 12:41 am CST

Jez, you are right Darwin didn't invent racism. Though for a while it seems that his theory justified it for the elite and the intellegentsia.

Bethany,
Thanks for reading.

You know I didn't know what to say about it either...except that I knew I was instantly angry at all the people who complain about how much America has gone downhill. If that's the way things used to be, I'm glad I didn't live then. That's probably not fair of me. I understand older folks longing for the day that they didn't lock their doors. But as I heard one old preacher put it recently, "I miss the good old days too. I just wouldn't want to relive them as a woman or a minority."

14. John - 03/31/2006 11:15 am CST

I was listening to WVTF (public radio in Virginia) when I heard the story of Oto Benga. I was stunned! Then I looked up Oto Benga on google and found your weblog. By the time I finished reading it, I was glancing nervously around the computer lab hoping nobody would notice me getting helplessly choked up and blinking back a flood.

15. Diane - 06/25/2006 11:37 pm CDT

To answer another poster's question, no, this was not an abberation and according to one source I read, blacks were not the only ones put on display.

16. Yves - 09/09/2006 6:32 am CDT

I too was listening to a New York's public radio station when I heard the story of Oto Benga. We must ask this of ourselves- Oto Benga, human or sub-human?
Diane #15- How do you think you would feel if placed in a cage with an animal for exhibition?
We should all to the very least try to respect each other and each other's culture. Hiding behind christianity won't help when the nind is already sicken through enviromental conditioning in beleiving that we are superior than our fellow humans because we have the guns and money. May Jesus Christ help us all!

Comments are closed